Karnataka High Court
CRP/270/2026 of SMT S M SAVITHRAMMA Vs SMT NEELAMMA on 11 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010203262026 NC: 2026:KHC:49772 CRP No. 270 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 270 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. S.M. SAVITHRAMMA W/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 270 OF 2026 (IO)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. S.M. SAVITHRAMMA
W/O JAGADEESHA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/A. NEAR BATLI BUILDING, J
ADIYAPPA BUILDING,
HARIHARA - 577 601.
2.
SMT. S.M. JYOTHI,
W/O. VAGEESH. B.S.,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/A. KANCHIKERE VILLAGE - 583 125,
HARAPANAHALLI TALUK,
VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT.
3.
SMT. S.M. REKHA,
W/O GIRISH H K,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/A.SHYAMANURU VILLAGE - 577 004,
4.
SMT. S.M. SUSHMITHA,
W/O. JAYESH.T,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/A.MAGADI ROAD,
SRIGANDHA KAVAL,
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
BENGALURU - 560 091.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHANDRAPPA T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. NEELAMMA
W/O LATE SHYAMANURU BASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS,
R/A MITTLAKATTE VILLAGE - 577 004,
HARIHARA TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.
2.
S.B. YOGESHAPPA,
S/O. LATE S.M.BASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/A.MITTLAKATTE VILLAGE - 577 004,
HARIHARA TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 27.10.2023 PASSED IN OS NO.146/2021
ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARIHARA., DISMISSING THE SUIT AS NOT MAINTAINABLE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The order impugned is dated 27.10.2023 passed in OS.No.146/2021 on the file of learned II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Harihara. Whereby, the Court has dismissed the suit. Against that, the petitioner has filed the present Civil Revision Petition.
2. The office has raised an objection regarding the maintainability under Section 115 of the CPC. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. An order dated 27.10.2023 is challenged before this Court by filing a CRP on 16.03.2026.
3. The office objection is sustained, and the CRP is not maintainable. The petitioner is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available to him in accordance with law, subject to the law of limitation.
4. It is made clear that the order is 2023. If the petitioner avails the remedy, the concerned Court has to consider the said delay in accordance with law. Accordingly, this Court is passing the following:
HC-KAR
ORDER
i. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with a liberty to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law and the issue of limitation is kept open.
ii. All IA’s in the petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11 *AK