Karnataka High Court
WP/28478/2026 of MR ARIJIT TIWARY Vs M/S BMS EDUCATIONAL TRUST on 11 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010628692026 NC: 2026:KHC:49720-DB WP No. 28478 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 28478 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
WRIT PETITION NO. 28478 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. ARIJIT TIWARY
S/O. MR. SANJOY KUMAR TIWARY,
AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
R/AT FLAT NO G/9, “A” BLOCK,
AWAS REGENCY, BHATIA BASTIKADMA,
NEAR AGRAWAL GAS GODOWN. PO-KADMA,
JAMSHEDPUR, PURBI SINGHBHUM,
JHARKHAND, -831 005.
2.
MR. MOHAMMED SHAHID
S/O. MR. FAROOK ALI,
AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS,
R/AT 19, 11TH CROSS,
VINAYAKA NAGARA, VIMANAOURA,
BANAGALORE-560 017.
3.
MR. YADHU NANDAN.D
S/O. MR. DHANANJAYA.L,
AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 50/3, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
7TH CROSS, AGRAHARA NORTH
BANGALORE-560 079.
4.
MR. SHREEVATHSA
S/O. MR. V.RAGHU,
AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 50, RAGAVENDRA NILAYA,
Digitally signed by
JAI JYOTHI J
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
10TH MAIN, 10TH CROSS,
MARUTHI NARAGAR, MALLESHPALYA,
BANGALORE NORTH, NEW THIPPASANDRA,
DISTRICT BANGALORE-560 075.
5.
MR. PRATYUSH PRAGYAN DAS
S/O. PULAK JYOTI DAS,
AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS,
R/AT HOUSE NO-45, RAJGARH,
BYELANE-11, SILPUKHRI,
DIST- KAMRUP METRO,
ASSAM-781 003.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. B.K.SAMPATH KUMAR., SENIOR COUNSEL A/W
SRI. MAHENDRA GOWDA.C.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
M/S. BMS EDUCATIONAL TRUST
REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE,
DR. B.S.RAGINI NARAYAN.,
DONOR TRUSTEE AND MEMBER SECRETARY.
P.O. 1908, BULL TEMPLE ROAD,
BANGALORE-19.
2.
3.
M/S. BMS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,
REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL,
P.O.1908, BULL TEMPLE ROAD,
BANGALORE-64.
M/S. BMS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL,
DODDABALAPUR MAIN ROAD,
AVLAHALLI, YELAHANKA,
BANGALORE-64.
4.
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION,
REP. ITS DIRECTOR,
TANTRIKA SHIKSHANA BHAVANA,
HC-KAR
PALACE ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
5.
KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE – 12.
6.
VISVESVARAYA TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR,
JNANA SANGAMA, BELAGAVI-590 018.
7.
CONSORTIUM OF MEDICAL, ENGINEERING
AND DENTAL COLLEGES OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
132, SECOND FLOOR, 11TH MAIN, 17TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE-560 055.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. BADRI VISHAL., ADVOCATE FOR R1-3; SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR., AGA FOR R4; SRI. N.K.RAMESH., ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. SURAJ NAIK., ADVOCATE FOR R7)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OR
DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE
1ST TO 3RD RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE NAMES OF
PETITIONERS FOR ADMISSION FROM AMONGST THE SEATS
THAT ARE REVERTED FROM CET AND COMED-K (GOVERNMENT
QUOTA) TO THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENT COLLEGES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. TO ISSUE A WRIT OR A DIRECTION
IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE FIRST TO
THIRD RESPONDENTS TO ADHERE TO THE CONSENSUAL
AGREEMENT
FOR
THE
YEAR
DATED
2026-27
DATED
30/04/2026
PRODUCED
AT
ANNEXURE-A
AND
AS
A
CONSEQUENCE
THEREOF
DIRECT
THE
1ST
TO
3RD
RESPONDENTS TO ADMIT THE STUDENTS TO THE SEATS THAT
ARE REVERTED FROM CET AND COMED-K (GOVERNMENT
QUOTA) TO THE 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENT COLLEGES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC.
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
&
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
Sri.Badri Vishal, learned counsel has filed Vakalatnama, on behalf of the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3, which are taken on record.
2. It has been stated by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 that apart from the petitioner No.3 i.e., Sri.Yadhu Nandan.D, all other petitioners had approached the respondent/institution and have been allotted seats and admitted on the seats reverted to the institution.
3. The learned counsel has stated that in case the petitioner No.3 approaches the institution concerned, steps would be taken for his admission as per Rules.
HC-KAR
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petition be disposed of, in view of the statement made.
5. This petition is accordingly disposed of giving liberty to petitioner No.3 to approach the respondent/institution, which will then take steps for admission of the petitioner No.3.
6. This order has been passed in the presence of the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.7 and Sri.N.K.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE JJ / List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1