Karnataka High Court

WP/28675/2026 of SRI.S. ESHWAR Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 11 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010630272026 NC: 2026:KHC:49597-DB WP No. 28675 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.28675 OF 2026 (GM-MM_S)

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

WRIT PETITION NO.28675 OF 2026 (GM-MM_S)

BETWEEN:

SRI. S. ESHWAR

S/O A. SUBRAMANI,

AGED 47 YEARS,

R/AT JYOTHIPURA VILLAGE,

KORA POST, DEVANAHALLI TALUK,

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 110.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. NAGESH P., SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W

SMT. NAYANA TARA B.G., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,

COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES,

(SSI, TEXTILES, AND MINES) DPT

1ST FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA,

BANGALORE-560 001.

2.

DIRECTOR,

DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY,

KHANIJA BHAVAN,

RACE COURSE ROAD,

BANGALORE-560 001.

Digitally signed by

MAHALAKSHMI B M

Location: High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

3.

SENIOR GEOLOGIST

DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY,

ADINARAYANA HOSAHALLI VILLAGE,

NAGADENAHALLI POST,

DODDABALLAPURA TALUK,

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 110.

4.

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,

1ST FLOOR, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE BHAVAN, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562 110.

5.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION,

DODDABALLAPURA TOWN,

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561 110.

6.

TAHASILDAR

TALUK ADMINISTRATIVE SOUDHA,

DEVANAHALLI TALUK,

DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562 110.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT

OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, DIRECTION, OR ORDER OF

SIMILAR NATURE QUASHING THE IMPUGNED COMMUNICATION

DATED 13.08.2026 BEARING NUMBER BRDC-JUD10MQL/162/2025

ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.

HC-KAR

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

and

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

1. The learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, impugning the communication dated 13.08.2026 addressed by the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate, Revenue Department, Government of Karnataka to the Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Bengaluru, withdrawing its No-Objection Certificate [NOC] dated 08.08.2016 and requesting that the steps be taken in accordance with the relevant rules.

3. The principal controversy involved in this regard is whether a quarry lease was permissible on land measuring 02 acres 23 guntas, falling in Survey No.40 of Mayasandra Village, Kundana Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District [leased land]. A

HC-KAR

NOC was issued, and after inspection, a quarry lease dated 20.04.2022 was granted over the said land for extraction of grey granite to be used for the manufacture of tiles and ornamental stone.

4. The issue had arisen was whether the lease was permissible in view of the allegation that a Nala as reflected in the village map existed in the leased land. This is also one of the principal grounds on which the communication withdrawing the NOC has been issued.

5. The petitioner had filed a writ petition being W.P. No.24739/2026 (GM-MM_S), which was taken up by this Court on 11.08.2026. In the said petition, the petitioner had impugned the notice dated 30.07.2026 issued by the Senior Geologist, Department of Mines and Geology suspending the quarrying operations under the said lease on the ground that a Nala, as reflected in the village map, existed on the leased land. The said petition was disposed of with the following directions: "5. In the given facts, we consider it apposite to direct that the impugned notice dated 30.07.2026 be treated as a show-cause notice. The petitioner is at liberty to file

HC-KAR

a detailed response to the same. Further, upon receipt of such response, the concerned authority shall consider the same and take an informed decision and communicate the decision to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from date.

6. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All rights and contentions of the parties are kept open."

6. Although the directions were issued to the Senior Geologist, the controversy to be addressed was precisely the same controversy on the basis of which the NOC was withdrawn.

7. In view of the above, we consider it apposite to suspend the impugned communication till the final decision is taken by the Senior Geologist pursuant to the order dated 11.08.2026 passed in W.P. No.24739/2026 (GM-MM_S). However, we also clarify that the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate / Revenue Authorities would be at liberty to furnish the inputs and the Senior Geologist would also consider the same.

8. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

HC-KAR

9. The concerned authority shall act upon the order uploaded on the website of this Court.

Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE

MBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead