Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6377/2020 of CHAKKILALA GOPINATH ANAND @ C.G. ANAND Vs SUREKHA E on 10 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010088462020 NC: 2026:KHC:49457 CRL.P No. 6377 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6377 OF 2020 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: CHAKKILALA GOPINATH ANAND @
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010088462020
NC: 2026:KHC:49457
CRL.P No. 6377 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6377 OF 2020 (482(Cr.PC) /
528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
CHAKKILALA GOPINATH ANAND @ C. G. ANAND
SON OF C.A.GOPINATH,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.1765, JUDICIAL LAYOUT,
BANGALORE - 560 065.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAKSHITH R., ADVOCATE (NOC) )
AND:
SUREKHA E
WIFE OF R KESHAVA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.1184,
22ND B MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS,
1ST SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT,
BEGNALURU - 562 102.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR R., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:23.03.2019 PASSED BY THE
XIX
A.C.M.M
AT
BENGALURU
IN
C.C.NO.6930/2019
(P.C.R.NO.16099/2018) FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF THE
N.I
ACT
AND
QUASH
ENTIRE
PROCEEDINGS
IN
C.C.NO.6930/2019.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010088462020
NC: 2026:KHC:49457
CRL.P No. 6377 of 2020
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent files a memo stating that the captioned petition has become infructuous, since the same arises out of C.C.No.6930/2019, which has been disposed of as settled between the parties. A copy of the order dated 22.07.2026 passed in C.C.No.6930/2019 is also produced as Document No.1. In view of the same, the petition has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also does not dispute the same.
In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
AM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32