Karnataka High Court
WP/4672/2025 of P.KUMARASWAMY Vs GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA on 10 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010102392025 NC: 2026:KHC:49257-DB WP No. 4672 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.4672 OF 2025 (GM-MM_S)
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO.4672 OF 2025 (GM-MM_S)
BETWEEN:
P. KUMARASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST
R/O NANDIHALLI VILLAGE,
SANDUR TALUKA,
BALLARI DISTRICT-583101.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MRINAL KUTTAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. SOMANNA K.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
DEPARTMENT OF MINES & GEOLOGY,
KHANIJA BHAVAN,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BANGALORE-560001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE AN
APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF
CERTIORARI
QUASHING
THE
IMPUGNED
ENDORSEMENT
NO.DMG/LS/CR NO.1118/2021/2023-24 19.02.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE- A ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT AND ETC.
Digitally signed by
MAHALAKSHMI B M
Location: High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the endorsement dated 19.02.2024 issued by the respondent, whereby the petitioner's representation seeking release and handing over of the iron ore seized from the petitioner was rejected.
2. The concerned authorities have stated that the said iron ore was not extracted in accordance with the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 [MMDR Act] from the mining lease area covered by the mining lease granted under the MMDR Act.
3. The petitioner seeks to challenge the said endorsement, and contends that he is entitled to possession of the iron ore in question.
HC-KAR
4. The learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the iron ore claimed by the petitioner has already been auctioned and sold to a third party for consideration of `7,99,19,614/-.
5. In view of the above, the prayer made by the petitioner for release of minerals, which are in custody of respondent does not survive for consideration.
6. The petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedies albeit in accordance with law, if aggrieved by the auction of the said iron ore.
Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
MBM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8