Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/2499/2019 of D S JHUNJHUNWALA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 10 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010245652019 NC: 2026:KHC:49384 CRL.P No. 2499 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2499 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. D S JHUNJHUNWALA S/O S R JHUNJHUNWALA AGED ABOUT 68
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2499 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1.
D S JHUNJHUNWALA
S/O S R JHUNJHUNWALA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
2.
ABHA JHUNJHUNWALA
W/O D S JHUNJHUNWALA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
3.
ARCHIT JHUNJHUWALA
S/O D S JHUNJHUNWALA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
ALL R/AT NO.1189, B
13TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE
INDRANAGAR
BANGALORE-560029
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI NAGARAJ S JAIN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH ULSOOR POLICE
BANGALORE
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BANGALORE
2.
V MUNIYAN
THE ENFORCEMTN OFFICER
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND
OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL
PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVANA
NO.13, RAJA RAMMOHAN ROY ROAD
P B NO.2584, BANGALORE-560025
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SUHAS GOWDA M, HCGP FOR R1;
SMT. NANDITA HALDIPUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.10649/2004 ON
THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE BANGALORE AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION , THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This matter is listed for admission. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the State and also the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
HC-KAR
2. This petition is filed praying this Court to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.10649/2004 on the file of IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that the offences invoked against the petitioners is Sections 406 and 409 read with Section 34 of IPC. The counsel would contend that the amount in due was already deposited and the company has paid the entire amount as alleged in the charge sheet i.e., an amount of Rs.1,98,553/- for the period from April 2003 to June 2003 along with the amounts pertaining to other periods totally amounting to Rs.16,97,963/- as per the determined of dues made by the Provident Fund Authority, that too, well before filing of the charge sheet by the police.
4. The counsel appearing for the respondents also not disputed the said fact but contend that the FIR was registered on 28.09.2003 and payment was made in the month of April 2004 that is subsequent to the registration of the case.
HC-KAR
5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and on perusal of the material on record, it discloses that there is no dispute with regard to the payment of amount is concerned. The coordinate Bench of this Court is also in Crl.P.No.3015/2016 connected with Crl.P.No.4680/2016 having considered the similar situation in C.C.Nos.10647/2004 and 10648/2004, in paragraph 5 extracted the contribution deducted by the petitioners has been subsequently remitted to the Employees Provident Fund on different dates and comes to the conclusion that considering identical situations in all the decisions referred above, this Court has quashed the proceedings initiated against the accused therein on the ground that in view of the remittances along with interest and damages, further prosecution of the petitioners is unnecessary.
6. Having taken note that in the similar facts and circumstances, the coordinate Bench of this Court already exercised its powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and in the case on hand also there is no dispute regarding the remittances is concerned. The only ground urged by the counsel for the respondents is that payment is made subsequent to the
HC-KAR
registration of the FIR but no dispute regarding payment is concerned. Under the circumstances, continuing of this criminal proceedings against the petitioners herein is unnecessary as observed by coordinate Bench of this Court. Hence, the petitioners are made out the grounds to quash entire proceedings in C.C.No.10649/2004.
7. In view of the discussions made above, I pass the following:
ORDER
The petition is allowed. The entire proceedings initiated against the petitioners in C.C.No.10649/2004 is hereby quashed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN