Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/8654/2019 of SRI. RAMANATH BHAT Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010535162019 NC: 2026:KHC:49398 CRL.P No. 8654 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8654 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMANATH BHAT S/O RAMAKRISHNA BHAT D AGED ABOUT

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8654 OF 2019

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI. RAMANATH BHAT

S/O RAMAKRISHNA BHAT D

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

RESIDING AT MALPANKATHI

SHIROORU VILLAGE AND POST

BYNDOOR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT-576 228

2.

SRI. RAMAKRISHNA D

S/O LATE DAVAPAIAH

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

RESIDING AT MALPANKATHI

SHIROORU VILLAGE AND POST

BYNDOOR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT-576 228

3.

SRI. DATTATRRAYA BHAT

S/O LATE DAVAPAIAH

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

RESIDING AT MALPANKATHI

SHIROORU VILLAGE AND POST

BYNDOOR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT-576 228

4.

SRI. RAGHURAMAIAH

S/O PARAMESHWARAIAH

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

RESIDING AT MALPANKATHI

SHIROORU VILLAGE AND POST

BYNDOOR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT-576 228

5.

SRI. RANGANATH BHAT

S/O RAMAKRISHNA D

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

RESIDING AT MALPANKATHI

SHIROORU VILLAGE AND POST

BYNDOOR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT-576 228

6.

SRI. RATHNAKAR SHETTY

S/O RAMAKRISHNA

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

RESIDING AT NEAR TOLLGATE CIRCLE

VIJAYANAGAR

BANGALORE-560 040

7.

SRI. SATHISH BHAT

S/O NAGARAJ BHAT

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

RESIDING AT NO.68-E

NEAR SATELATE BUS STAND

KENGERE

8.

SRINAGASRI SHETTY

S/O SURENDRA SHETTY

AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

R/AT BYNDOOR VILLAGE AND POST

BYNDOOR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT-576 228

9.

SRI. JAGADEESH B

S/O NARAYANA ACHARI

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

NEAR AMBA XEROX SHOP

BYNDOOR

HC-KAR

YADTHRE VILLAGE AND POST

BYNDOOR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT-576 228

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER

BYNDOOR POLICE STATION

BYNDOOR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT

REPRESENTED BY

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

BANGALORE-560 001

2.

SRI. SURANDRA DAVADIGA

S/O NARAYANA DAVADIGA

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

VENKANAMANE

MALPANKATHI

SHIROORU VILLAGE AND POST

BYNDOOR TALUK

UDUPI DISTRICT-576 214

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI SUHAS GOWDA M, HCGP FOR R1;

R2 – SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)

THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO

QUASH, AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN THE FIR

BEARING NO.217/2019 DATED 09.11.2019 AS PER ANNEXURE- A AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

This matter is called twice i.e., in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

2. This matter is listed for admission. Though this matter is of the year 2019, the counsel for the petitioners is not pursuing the matter diligently.

3. The prayer is sought in the petition is to quash the FIR No.217/2019 dated 09.11.019 against the petitioners herein and also quash the entire proceedings in PCR No.144/2019 against the petitioners herein pending on the file of II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapur for the offences punishable under Sections 196, 418, 420, 465, 468, 471, 474, 109, 120B read with Section 34 of IPC.

4. In view of the counsel for the petitioners is not pursuing the matter even after seven years since the petition of

HC-KAR

the year 2019, this Court do not find any grounds to entertain this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

5. In view of dismissal of the main petition, I.A. if any, does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

SN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead