Karnataka High Court
RERA.A/30/2026 of SRI. C.K. NAROTHAM Vs THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (KRERA) on 10 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010434452026 NC: 2026:KHC:49386-DB RERA.A No. 30 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU RERA APPEAL NO.30 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. C. K.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
RERA APPEAL NO.30 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI. C. K. NAROTHAM
S/O LATE C. V. KESHAVAMURTHY,
AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.15,
NORTH PARK ROAD,
KUMARA PARK EAST,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SENTHIL KUMAR D U, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY
AUTHORITY (KRERA)
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT
NO.1/14, 2ND FLOOR,
SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK,
BEHIND UNITY BUILDING,
CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS,
MISSION ROAD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2.
SRI. M.R. BASKARAN VASUDEVAN,
S/O SRI. VASUDEVAN,
Digitally signed by
JAI JYOTHI J
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
3.
SMT. SUJAYALAKSHMI BASKARAN,
W/O DR. BASKARAN,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
BOTH RESPONDENTS NO.2 & 3
RESIDING AT PLOT NO.HIG-I-30,
3RD MAIN ROAD, NOLAMBUR PHASE-I,
MOGAPPAIR WEST,
CHENNAI - 600 037.
ALSO AT: VILLA NO.35,
“ARBORS BY THE LAKE”,
KYALASANAHALLI VILLAGE,
JIGANI HOBLI,
BENGALURU - 560 105.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SUMAN K.S, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS RERA.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE REAL
ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT 2017 PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED
30.04.2026 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE REAL ESTATE APPELLATE
TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU IN APPEAL NO.(K-REAT) 116/2025
AND CONSECUTIVELY ALLOW THE APPEAL NO.(K-REAT)
RESULTING
IN
DISMISSAL
OF
COMPLAINT
NO.00416/2024 AND AWARD COSTS OF THIS PROCEEDINGS.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
and
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
When the matter was listed on 19.08.2026, the following order was passed: “The counsel for the appellant seeks an adjournment to enable him to prepare the case. List on 02.09.2026.”
2. On 02.09.2026, the following order was passed:
“No one appeared for the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. List this matter for ‘Dismissal’ on 10.09.2026.”
3. Today, the matter is listed for dismissal. Yet, no one appears for the appellant when the matter is called.
4. The instant appeal is filed seeking the following reliefs: “Wherefore the Appellant most humbly prays before this Hon’ble Court to:
a. Call for records in Complaint No.00416/2024 dated 01.09.2025 from the Ld. Respondent No.1 and in Appeal No.(K-REAT) 116/2025 from the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal; and
HC-KAR
b. Set aside the impugned Judgment and Order dated 30.04.2026 passed by the Hon’ble Real Estate Appellate Tribunal at Bengaluru in Appeal No.(K- REAT) 116/2025 resulting in dismissal of Complaint No.00416/2024; and / or
c. Award costs of this proceedings; and / or
d. To grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”
5. The appeal filed before the Tribunal was against the impugned order dated 01.09.2025 passed by the Authority under Complaint No.00416/2024. The Appellate Tribunal had dismissed the appeal and confirmed the order of the Authority.
6. Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, this appeal is dismissed.
7. Let this order be communicated by the Registry forthwith to the Tribunal as well as the Authority, for initiating necessary steps.
HC-KAR
8. This order has been passed in the presence of the counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33