Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/2298/2020 of S RAMESH Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 10 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010095012020 NC: 2026:KHC:49449 CRL.P No. 2298 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2298 OF 2020 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: S. RAMESH S/O SONNAPPA, AGED
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010095012020
NC: 2026:KHC:49449
CRL.P No. 2298 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2298 OF 2020 (482(Cr.PC) /
528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
S. RAMESH
S/O SONNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
R/AT DODDADUNNASANDRA VILLAGE,
ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI,
HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE-560067.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.G. RAJENDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ANUGONDANAHALLI POLICE,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT,
BANGALORE-01.
2.
SMT. KAVITHA
W/O HARISHA,
D/O MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
R/AT DODDADUNNASANDRA VILLAGE,
ANUGONDANAHLLI HOBLI,
HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALRE-560067.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH
THE
CHARGE
SHEET
FILED
AGAINST
THE
PETITIONER
IN
S.C.NO.28/2016 (CR.NO.13/2014) OF ANUGONDANAHALLI POLICE
STATION FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.420, 376, 504, 323, 354, 506, 313, 114 R/W SEC.149 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010095012020
NC: 2026:KHC:49449
CRL.P No. 2298 of 2020
HON'BLE
VI
ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
AM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23