Karnataka High Court

WP/8982/2026 of SRI BALAMANJUNATHA SWAMIJI Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010200182026 NC: 2026:KHC:49426 WP No. 8982 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 8982 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI BALAMANJUNATHA SWAMIJI S/O NANJAPPA AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

WRIT PETITION NO. 8982 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE)

BETWEEN:

SRI BALAMANJUNATHA SWAMIJI

S/O NANJAPPA

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

MKATADIPATHI SRI VIDYA CHOWDESHWARI MUTT

HANGARAHALLI BENCHAKALLU ROAD

HKULIYURUDURGA HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK

TUKMKURU DISTRICT 572123

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. VINOD KUMAR M, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP BY ITS CHILEF SECRETARY

VIDHANA SOUDHA

DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI

BENGALURU 560001

2.

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HEADQUARTERS

NRUPATUNGA ROAD

BENGALURU 560001

3.

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

TUMKURU DISTRICT

TUMKURU KARNATAKA

Digitally

signed by

BHARATHI S

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

4.

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

AMRUTHUR POLICE STATION

KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKURU DISTRICT

KARNATAKA

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. HARISHA A S, AGA FOR R1 TO R4

SRI. VENKATESH P DALWAI, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE

IMPUGNED

NOTICE,

DATED

08.03.2026,

BEARING

NO.

E/CC/103/2026 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO. 4 PRODUCED AT

ANNEXURE C, RELATED TO ALLEGED CIVIL FINANCIAL

DISPUTE.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs:

1. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the impugned notice, dated 08.03.2026, bearing No.E/CC/103/2026 issued by Respondent No.4 produced at Annexure C, related to alleged civil financial dispute.

2. Issue a Writ of Prohibition or any other appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the Respondents from interfering in the purely civil and financial dispute and from harassing the petitioner.

3. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice, equity, and good conscience."

HC-KAR

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the notice dated 08.03.2026 (Annexure C to the Writ Petition) requiring the personal presence of the petitioner. The said notice/intimation dated 08.03.2026 has been issued by the concerned authorities consequent to a complaint filed by the proposed respondent No.5.

3. It is the contention of the learned counsel of the petitioner that even a copy of the said complaint lodged by respondent No.5 was not enclosed with the notice dated 08.03.2026 and only a summary of the allegations have been mentioned in the said notice dated 08.03.2026. However, it is submitted that a copy of the complaint has been annexed along with IA.No2/2026 for impleading that is filed by the proposed respondent No.5. It is the contention of the petitioner that the allegations of the proposed respondent No.5 are purely civil in nature.

4. At the present stage, which is at the threshold of the initiation of proceedings, it is expedient that adjudication as to whether the allegations are purely civil in nature is not undertaken by this Court in the present proceedings. It shall be open to the petitioner to respond to the notice/intimation dated 08.03.2026 as well as the allegations made in the complaint dated 17.02.2026 (copy

HC-KAR

of which is annexed as Annexure-R1 to IA.No.2/2026) to the concerned authorities. Consequent to the response of the petitioner, it shall be open to the concerned authorities to conduct further proceedings in accordance with law. For the present, until the response of the petitioner is furnished to the intimation and complaint dated 17.02.2026, the requirement of the petitioner appearing before the concerned authorities pursuant to the intimation dated 08.03.2026 is dispensed with.

5. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforementioned terms.

6. Needless to state that the respective parties shall co-operate with the concerned authorities for the process to be undertaken in accordance with law.

7. All rights and contentions of the parties on the merits of the matter are kept open.

8. Pending IAs., if any, stand disposed of.

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE ND List No.: 1 Sl No.: 75

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead