Karnataka High Court
WP/28331/2026 of SMT. RATHNAMMA Vs SRI. RAMESHA on 9 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010620002026 NC: 2026:KHC:49171 WP No. 28331 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 28331 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O JANARDHANA SETTY, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 28331 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. RATHNAMMA
W/O JANARDHANA SETTY,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/AT ALDUR HOSAHALLI VILLAGE,
ALDUR POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK,
PIN 577101.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI JAGADEESH D. C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. RAMESHA
S/O SIDDAPPA SETTY,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
R/AT ALDUR HOSAHALLI VILLAGE,
ALDUR POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK,
PIN 577101.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE
TRIAL COURT TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OFF THE IA NO. 1
FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 CPC VIDE ANNEXURE
A-1, EXPEDITIOUSLY IN O.S NO.410/2026 IN ACCORDANCE
WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA B S
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The limited grievance in the present writ petition is the non-consideration of I.A. No.1 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC, seeking an order of temporary injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff over the suit schedule property.
2. It is submitted that though the trial Court issued notice on the application, returnable by 28.08.2026, on the said date, further time was granted to the defendants for filing their objections. It is further submitted that the non-consideration of I.A. No.1 has caused irreparable damage to the suit schedule property.
3. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Upon the appearance of both parties and their availability before the trial Court, the trial Court is directed to consider and
HC-KAR
pass necessary orders on I.A. No.1 within two weeks from the date of placing a copy of this order on record. For the said purpose, the petitioner is permitted to seek advancement of the suit.
5. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
VP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38