Karnataka High Court
WP/27645/2026 of T R SRINIVAS REDDY Vs NANJA REDDY on 9 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010607162026 NC: 2026:KHC:49272 WP No. 27645 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 27645 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. T R SRINIVAS REDDY S/O T RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 72
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 27645 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
T R SRINIVAS REDDY
S/O T RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
R/AT 'NISARGA' T RAMIAH GARDEN,
SOS POST, HULIMAVU
BANNERGHATTA ROAD,
BANGALORE-560076.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RANGANATH REDDY R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
NANJA REDDY
S/O ANKA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI,
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068.
2.
SADASHIV REDDY
S/O LATE ANKA REDDY,
SINCE DEAD BY LR'S
SMT. LAKSHMI
D/O LATE SADHASHIVA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/AT NO.131/3, KARIANPALYA,
RAMACHANDRA LAYOUT,
Digitally
signed by
VINUTHA B S
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
6TH CROSS, LINGARAJAPURAM,
BANGALORE-560068
3.
CHAITRA REDDY
D/O LATE SADASHIVA REDDY
RAMACHANDRA LAYOUT,
R/AT NO131/3, KARIANPALYA,
6TH CROSS, LINGARAJAPURAM
BANGALORE-56006
4.
VISHWANATH REDDY
S/O ANKA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068
5.
SIDDHA REDDY
S/O THIMMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068.
6.
BABU REDDY
S/O JAYARAMA REDDY (S/O THIMMA REDDY)
SINCE DEAD BY LR'S
SMT BHAGYALAKSHMI K C
W/O LATE BABU REDDY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OLD
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068
7.
SHEWTHA B
D/O LATE BABU REDDY
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068
HC-KAR
8.
SHILPA B
D/O BABU REDDY
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068
9.
PRITHVI REDDY
S/O LATE BABU REDDY
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068
10.
VIMALAMMA
W/O GOVINDA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068
11.
LINGA REDDY
S/O THIMMA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068
12.
KESHAVA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
R/AT MYLASANDIRA GRAMA,
BEGUR HOBLI
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560068
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
DIRECTING
THE
LEARNED
PRINCIPAL
CIVIL
JUDGE,
BENGALURU
RURAL,
PENDING
IN
O.S.
NO.
563/2017,
HC-KAR
(ANNEXURE
A)
TO
DISPOSE
OF
THE
SAID
SUIT
EXPEDITIOUSLY AND PREFERABLY WITHIN A PERIOD OF SIX
MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THE ORDER OF THIS
HON'BLE COURT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri. Ranganath Reddy R., learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the trial Court to dispose of O.S. No.563/2017 expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months.
3. A perusal of the order sheet placed on record indicates that service on some of the defendants is not yet complete, though the suit is of the year 2017. Unless service of notice on all the parties is completed, which is the responsibility of the plaintiff, this Court finds no justification to grant the prayer made in the present petition. However, considering that the suit is of the year 2017 and that the plaintiff and some of
HC-KAR
the respondents are aged above 60 years, the trial Court is requested to expedite the disposal of the suit by avoiding unnecessary or prolonged adjournments after service of notice on the remaining parties is complete. Accordingly, petition stands rejected.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26