Karnataka High Court
WP/20690/2026 of THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs SRI HANMANTHRAYA, on 9 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010461372026 NC: 2026:KHC:48998-DB WP No. 20690 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 20690 OF 2026 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 20690 OF 2026 (S-KSAT)
BETWEEN:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND
SECONDARY EDUCATION
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
M.S. BUILDINGS
BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF
PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
18TH CROSS ROAD
SAMPIGE ROAD
MALLESWARAM
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA, AGA)
AND:
1.
SRI. HANMANTHRAYA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
Digitally signed
by AASEEFA
PARVEEN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
S/O SRI. KALLAPAKARIGUDDA
RESIDENT OF DEVARGONAL
SHORAPUR TALUK
YADGIR-585 224.
2.
SRI. GURUNATH
AGED MAJOR
RESIDING AT POST- YEWOOR
TALUK SHORAPUR
YADGIR-585 309.
3.
THE DIRECTOR
KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY
18TH CROSS ROAD
SAMPIGE ROAD
MALLESWARAM
BENGALURU-560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRITHVEESH M.K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. N.K.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING ISSUE A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER
DATED NOVEMBER 16, 22023, PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL IN
APPLICATION No.6893 OF 2020 AND ETC.
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
and
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
1. Heard both the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. Learned counsel Sri. Prithveesh M.K., appearing for respondent nos.1 and 2 would submit that the very same order passed by the Tribunal dated 16.11.2023 in Application No.6893/2020 was the subject matter of W.P.No.9314/2024 and the said writ petition was allowed by order dated 10.08.2026.
3. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition filed by the State is allowed in terms of the order dated 10.08.2026 in W.P.No.9314/2024. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE PGG