Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/6436/2019 of SRI MOHAMMED HABEEBULLA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 9 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010417962019 NC: 2026:KHC:49050 CRL.P No. 6436 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6436 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MOHAMMED HABEEBULLA S/O MOHAMMED HANEEF AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6436 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. MOHAMMED HABEEBULLA
S/O MOHAMMED HANEEF
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R/AT NO.1-53-29
JASMIN MANZIL
DARBAR HILL, ALAPE PADIL
MANGALURU-575007.
2.
SRI. MOHAMMED SHAFEEULLA
S/O MOHAMMED HANEEF
R/AT NO.1-53-29
JASMIN MANZIL
DARBAR HILL, ALAPE PADIL
MANGALURU-575007.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHARADI S. SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH THE POLICE INSPECTOR
URVA POLICE STAITON, MANGALURU
REPRESENTED BY ITS
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-560001.
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. KATHIJA RAFEEYA
W/O MOHAMMED SHAFEEQU
R/AT FLAT NO.HD 42
BEARYS HIS GRACE APRTMENT
HATHILL, LALBAGH, BEJAI
MANGALURU-575006.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. DIVAKAR MADDUR, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SUYOG HERELE E., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.69/2019
BY
URVA
POLICE
STATION,
MANGALURU,
REGISTERED
AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
UNDER SECTIONS 465, 468, 471, 380, 420 R/W SECTION 34
OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
(SR. DN.) AND CJM COURT, MANGALURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that he is not pressing the petition for time being and seeks liberty to approach this Court after filing of charge-sheet.
2. The memo is taken on record.
HC-KAR
Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as sought.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26