Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/4362/2022 of SMT. MAHAMOODA BANU @ GULNAZ Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 9 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010199812022 NC: 2026:KHC:48854 CRL.P No. 4362 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4362 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MAHAMOODA BANU @ GULNAZ, W/O SYED ABDUL JABBAR,

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4362 OF 2022

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT. MAHAMOODA BANU @ GULNAZ,

W/O SYED ABDUL JABBAR,

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

R/AT NO.17, EX-SERVICEMEN COLONY,

R.T. NAGAR POST,

BENGALURU-560032.

2.

SRI SYED FAROOQ @ SYED AFZAL,

S/O SYED ABDUL RAHAMAN,

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

R/AT NO.5/1, 1ST CROSS,

MATADAHALLI, MEENA MASJID,

BENGALURU-560032.

3.

SMT. FARHANA SULTANA

@ RESHMA FARAHANA SULTANA,

W/O SYED FAROOQ @ SYED AFZAL,

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

R/AT NO.35, 1ST MAIN, 4TH CORSS,

OPP: NEWTON PUBLIC SCHOOL,

KANAKA NAGAR, R.T.NAGAR POST,

BENGALURU-560032.

4.

SMT. NASEEBA BANU @ SYEDA MOHAMMADI,

W/O SYED NOOR AHMED,

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

NO.26, ISHAQ SAHEB STREET,

J.C. NAGAR, BENGALURU-06.

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

5.

SMT. NAVEEDA BANU @ NAVEEDA,

W/O SYED ABDUL WAHAB,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

NO.5/1A, A.K. ASHRAM,

1ST CROSS, MATQADAHALLI,

MEENA MASJID, R.T.NAGAR POST,

BENGALURU-32.

6.

SMT. ZAKIRAUNNISA @ ZAKEERA,

W/O LUKHMAN FURKHAN SHARIFF,

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

R/AT NO.860, 11TH ‘A’ CROSS,

1ST STAGE, 3RD BLOCK,

HBR LAYOUT, KALYAN NAGAR,

BENGALURU-560043.

7.

SMT. TABASSUM BANU @ TABASSUM,

W/O FAROOK MUSTAFA C.M.,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,

RA/T NO.17, 1ST CROSS,

EX-SERVICMEN COLONY,

BENGALURU-560002.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. HOSAMANI SHAKEELAHMAD MEERANSAB, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

ULSOOR GATE WOMEN POLIC STATION,

EAST ZONE, BENGALURU.

2.

SMT. MEHTAB KHATOON,

W/O SYED RAFIQ AHMD,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.3265,

3RD G MAIN, NAGAMMA LAYOUT,

HC-KAR

K.B.SANDRA, R.T. NAGARA

BENGALURU-560022.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP FOR R1; SRI. N.V.VASANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482

OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS

FILED AGAINST THEM IN C.C.NO.25014/2018 WHICH HAVE

BEEN INITIATED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE PENDING

ON THE FILE OF THE VI ACMM, BENGALURU.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The petitioners and respondent No.2 are present before the Court along with their respective learned counsel and have filed a joint affidavit. The learned Additional SPP appearing for respondent No.1/State is also present.

2. In terms of the joint affidavit, the matter is settled for an amount of Rs.16,00,000/-. Out of that, an amount of Rs.12,77,500/- is already paid in favour of respondent No.2 and today an amount of Rs.1,22,500/- is paid by way of demand draft and an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- by way of cash. The terms of the settlement are complied.

HC-KAR

3. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of GIAN SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, the parties are permitted to settle the matter and the issue involved between the parties is only a private dispute and not against the society at large and hence, the Court can exercise the discretion under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioners.

4. In view of the joint affidavit, the petition is disposed of and the proceedings initiated against the petitioners by respondent No.2 is hereby quashed.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead