Karnataka High Court

WP/31061/2024 of SMT.LAKSHMAMMA Vs THE CHIEF MANAGER on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010667482024 NC: 2026:KHC:49424 WP No. 31061 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 31061 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA W/O THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 57

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

WRIT PETITION NO. 31061 OF 2024 (GM-DRT)

BETWEEN:

1.

SMT.LAKSHMAMMA

W/O THIMMEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

2.

SRI.THIMMEGOWDA

S/O KARIHANUMEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

BOTH ARE R/O KABBIGARAHALLI

VILLAGE, SIDDIGERE POST

CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK

AND DISTRICT - 577101

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. GIRISH B BALADARE, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE CHIEF MANAGER

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

CHIKKAMAGALURU TOWN,

I G ROAD,

CHIKKAMAGALUR - 577101

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. NARAYANAPPA S R, ADVOCATE)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT QUASHING THE

ANNEXURE-B THAT IS THE THAT IS ORDER DTD 19.09.2024

Digitally

signed by

BHARATHI S

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT

CHIKKAMAGALURU IN CRL. MISC. 193/2024 PASSED AGAINST

THE PETITIONERS.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under: "Memo for withdrawal

The undersigned counsel appearing for petitioner herewith submits that, as per the instruction of petitioner, the financial issue between the petitioner with respondent bank was settled. In view of the same, the continuation of above petition does not serve any purpose. Therefore, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the above petition as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity.

Bangalore sd/- Date: 24-08-2026 (Advocate for petitioner)"

2. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA

HC-KAR

3. In view of dismissal of the main petition pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and accordingly, disposed of.

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

PNV List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1 Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead