Karnataka High Court
WP/28843/2026 of ANJUMAN E ISLAMIA Vs COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AUDIT 1) on 9 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010637642026 NC: 2026:KHC:49423 WP No. 28843 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 28843 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: ANJUMAN E ISLAMIA A WAQF INSTITUTION, SITUATED AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 28843 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
ANJUMAN E ISLAMIA
A WAQF INSTITUTION,
SITUATED AT DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
KOLLEGALA CITY AND TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CARETAKER,
MR. ASIF KHAN U,
S/O. LATE. M. USMAN KHAN, WAKF OFFICER
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
DISTRICT WAQF OFFICE,
CHAMARAJANAGAR.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. USMAN P, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AUDIT 1)
MYSURU.
2.
THE TAHASILDAR,
OFFICE OF THE TAHASILDAR,
KOLLEGAL TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.
3.
MOHAMMED ABDULLAH S,
PROPRIETOR, S.M.A. TRADERS,
NO. 7/2339, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD,
KOLLEGALA,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.
RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HARISHA A S, AGA FOR R1 & R2)
Digitally
signed by
BHARATHI S
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
AUCTION NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. DCB/CR-02/2026-27
DATED 27.08.2026 PRODUCED AS ANNX-A IN SO FAR AS IT
PERTAINS TO THE PORTION OF THE PROPERTY MEASURING TO
AN EXTENT OF 40FT X 30 FT BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition and filed a memo which reads as under: "Memo for withdrawal
The petitioner prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above writ petition with liberty to workout his remedies with the 3rd respondent in the interest of justice. Bangalore sd/- Dt:9.9.2026 (Advocate for petitioner)"
2. In view of the submission and memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA
HC-KAR
3. This order will not preclude the petitioner from availing such remedies as is permissible under law.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
PNV List No.: 3 Sl No.: 2
Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA