Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/4884/2019 of SRI H B LINGAIAH Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 8 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010192212019 NC: 2026:KHC:48523 CRL.P No. 4884 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4884 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SRI H B LINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SON OF LATE BORAIAH
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010192212019
NC: 2026:KHC:48523
CRL.P No. 4884 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4884 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SRI H B LINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
SON OF LATE BORAIAH
RESIDING AT K HOSAHALLI
MESTRI RAMANNA PALYA
KOTHAGERE HOBLI
KUNIGAL TALUK
TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY LOKAYUKTHA POLICE
TUMKUR-572 101
REP. BY SPL. SPP
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU-560 001
2.
SRI VIRUPAKSHE GOWDA
S/O LATE UGRE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
R/AT 59A, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE
MANJUANTHA NAGAR
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010192212019
NC: 2026:KHC:48523
CRL.P No. 4884 of 2019
RAJAJINAGAR
BANGALORE-560 010
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VENKATESH S ARABATTI, SPL. COUNSEL FOR R1; SRI C S MADHU, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
QUASH
THE
FINAL
REPORT/CHARGE
SHEET
DATED
17.05.2016,
IN
CRIME
NO.33/2014,
FILED
IN
SPL.C.C.NO.168/2016 ON THE FILE THE VII ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMKUR AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner/accused No.1 submits that accused No.1 is no more and hence, this petition has become infructuous. The said submission is taken on record. In view of the said submission, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN