Karnataka High Court

WP/21889/2026 of THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., Vs SRI TIMOTHY CHARLES, on 8 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010479692026 NC: 2026:KHC:49057 WP No. 21889 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 21889 OF 2026 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., A BANKING COMPANY

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

WRIT PETITION NO. 21889 OF 2026 (GM-CON)

BETWEEN:

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.,

A BANKING COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER

THE COMPANIES ACT 1913,

HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND

HEAD OFFICE AT MISSION QUARTERS,

T.B. ROAD, THRISSUR - 680 001

REP. BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER

MR. DARSHAN S. BHAVIKATTI AT

1ST FLOOR, NO. 74, MUSEUM ROAD

PO. SUMERU TOWERS, BRIGADE ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 025.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. NARAYANA SHENOY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI. TIMOTHY CHARLES,

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO. 2B,

DAFFODILS APARTMENTS,

TRINITY FORTUNE LAYOUT,

GEDDALAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 077.

2.

DR. ASHA CHARLES ALIAS ASHA SAM,

MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO.2B, DAFFODILS

HC-KAR

APARTMENTS, TRINITY FORTUNE LAYOUT,

GEDDALAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 077.

3.

SRI. JEFFERSON ELEAZER DHARMARAJ,

MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO. 40,

BLOCK 1, OFF HENNUR BYRATHI ROAD,

BENGALURU - 560 077.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. VISHNU HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN

THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE

WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO. 4, THE

II

ADDITIONAL

DISTRICT

CONSUMER

DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT TO

TAKE UP, HEAR AND DISPOSE OF CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.

463/2021 PENDING ON ITS FILE, EXPEDITIOUSLY AND IN

ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, IN ANY EVENT WITHIN AN OUTER

TIME LIMIT OF FOUR WEEKS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF A

COPY OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, WITHOUT

GRANTING UNNECESSARY ADJOURNMENTS TO THE PARTIES

AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING

IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS

UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs:- "a. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction,

HC-KAR

directing the II Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore Urban District to take up, hear and dispose of Consumer Complaint No.463/2021 in Annexure-B pending on its file, expeditiously and in accordance with law, in any event within an outer time limit of FOUR WEEKS from the date of receipt of a copy of the order of this Hon'ble Court, without granting unnecessary adjournments to the parties;

b. Direct the commission to report compliance to this Hon'ble Court upon disposal of C.C.No.463/2021

c. Pass such other and further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, including an order as to costs, in the interest of justice and equity".

2. The petitioner seeks for a direction to the II Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore Urban District to hear and dispose of Consumer Complaint No.463/2021 as expeditiously as possible.

3. It is the vehement contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that having regard to the peculiar facts of the present case the matter having been remanded to the Consumer Commission and the same

HC-KAR

having not proceeded for a substantial period of time, the relief as sought for in the writ petition is to be granted.

4. In the absence of relevant details as to the number of cases pending before the concerned Court, a time-bound direction cannot be granted.

5. However the present writ petition is disposed of requesting the II Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, to dispose of Consumer Complaint No.463/2021 as expeditiously as possible.

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 120

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead