Karnataka High Court
WP/21284/2026 of SPOORTHY INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS (I) PRIVATE LIMITED Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 8 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010474882026 NC: 2026:KHC:49028 WP No. 21284 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 21284 OF 2026 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: SPOORTHY INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS (I) PRIVATE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 21284 OF 2026 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
SPOORTHY INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS
(I) PRIVATE LIMITED,
FORMERLY KNOWN AS SPOORTHY SECURITY
AND ALLIED SERVICES PVT. LTD.,
A PVT. LTD. COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER
THE COMPANIES ACT 2013,
REPRESENTED BY ITS C.E.O.
SRI. T.N. GANGADHAR,
NO. 415, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH A CROSS,
OUTER RING ROAD, 7TH BLOCK,
NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560 072
MOB. NO: 8296363332
EMAIL: gm@spoorthygroup.in
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HARSHAVARDHAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, M.S.
BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR BEEDI,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
HC-KAR
2.
BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE
AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE (B.M.C.R.I.)
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR CUM DEAN,
FORT, K.R. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 002.
3.
THE DIRECTOR CUM DEAN,
BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND
RESEARCH INSTITUTE (B.M.C.R.I.) FORT,
K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002.
4.
THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR (FA)
BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE
AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE (B.M.C.R.I.)
FORT, K.R. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 002.
5.
DIRECTORATE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION (DME)
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,
BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE
AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE (B.M.C.R.I.)
CAMPUS, FORT, K.R. ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 002.
6.
TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY
CARE CENTER (TCC)
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
VICTORIA HOSPITAL CAMPUS, FORT,
7.
THE SPECIAL OFFICER
TENDER INVITING AUTHORITY AND CHAIRMAN
TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY CARE CENTER (TCC)
VICTORIA HOSPIAL CAMPUS, FORT
HC-KAR
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PHANINI A.H, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. MOHAMMED AYUB, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R7)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING TENDER NO. DME/2025- 26/SE0670/CALL-2, DATED 22.06.2026 CALLED OUT BY THE
RESPONDENT
NO.7
FOR
PROVIDING
WARD
ATTENDER
SERVICES TO TRAUMA CARE CENTER (TECC), VICTORIA
CAMPUS, BENGALORE WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs:- "a. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ
No.DME/2025-26/SEO670/Call-2, dated 2.06.2026 called out by the Respondent No.7 for providing Ward attender Services to Trauma Care Center (TECC), Victoria Campus, Bengaluru which is at Annexure-A.
HC-KAR
b. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ quashing the tender Notification bearing tender No.DME/2025-26/SEO669/Call-2, dated 22.06.2026 called out by the Respondent No.7 for providing Housekeeping Services, to Trauma Care Center (TECC) Victoria Campus, Bangalore which is at Annexure-B.
c. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ quashing the tender Notification bearing tender No.DME/2025-26/SE0671/Call-2, dated 22.06.2026 called out by the Respondent No.7 for providing Security Services to Trauma Care Center (TECC) Victoria Campus, Bengaluru, which is at Annexure-C.
d. Issue a Writ or any other nature of Writ or order or direction and grant such other relief in favour of the Petitioner as deem fit in the circumstances of the case in the ends of justice and equity".
2. Although various reliefs are sought in the present writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the corrigendum dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure-V to the writ petition) whereunder the 2nd respondent has stipulated that in the event of there being more than 1 bidder as "L-1", the Bidder offering the highest performance security deposit above the stipulated 5% would be considered for award of the contract.
HC-KAR
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that vide the corrigendum dated 30.06.2026 (Annexure-S to the writ petition), the stipulation that in the case of more than one bidder, be has "L-1", the bidders scoring the highest marks in the Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS) will be awarded to the contract was issued prior to the impugned corrigendum dated 07.07.2026 which was just and proper.
4. The Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions submits that in the event of there being more than 1 bidder as L-1, the evaluation of the bids would be in terms of the corrigendum dated 30.06.2026 (Annexure- S to the writ petition). It is further submitted that the corrigendum dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure-V to the writ petition) insofar as it stipulates regarding the evaluation of the technical tender is contrary to the provisions of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999 and hence the same be quashed by this Court.
HC-KAR
5. In view of the submissions made by both the learned counsels, the corrigendum dated 07.07.2026 (Annexure-V to the writ petition) insofar as it relates to the evaluation of the technical tender is hereby quashed.
6. The evaluation of the tenders which are the subject matter of the present writ petition with regard to the consideration of the same if more than one bidder is "L-1", shall be done in terms of the corrigendum dated 30.06.2026 (Annexure-S to the writ petition).
7. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforementioned terms.
8. Pending I.As, if any, stand disposed of.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 119