Karnataka High Court
CCC/877/2025 of SMT. VANI, Vs SRI. PURUSHOTTAM on 8 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010455452025 NC: 2026:KHC:48528-DB CCC No.877 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 877 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010455452025
NC: 2026:KHC:48528-DB
CCC No.877 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 877 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SMT.VANI,
W/O PURUSHOTTAM,
AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,
R/AT NO.1376, NEAR SVVK SCHOOL,
KODIGEHALLI, BENGALURU-560 097.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY MS.SAMHITHA.V., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
SRI.PURUSHOTTAM
ALIAS SEETHALAKSHMI.R,
S/O SRI.VENKATANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
JAYANTI GRAMAM, BICHAGONDALLI CROSS,
BAGEPALLI TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-561 209.
…ACCUSED
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS
11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE
215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO TAKE COGNIZANCE AND PUNISH
THE
ACCUSED
FOR
CONTEMPT
OF
COURT
FOR
WILFUL
DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 30.06.2021 PASSED IN
W.P.H.C.NO.38/2021 (ANNEXURE-A)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by K S
RENUKAMBA
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010455452025
NC: 2026:KHC:48528-DB
CCC No.877 of 2025
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
and
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
Yet again, no one appears for the complainant. The contempt petition is consigned. We leave it open to the complainant to move an appropriate application for restoration of this case should the cause for sustaining the contempt petition survives, no later than a period of one month from today.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6