Karnataka High Court
CRL.A/1411/2026 of MR MAHESHA V N Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 8 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010575432026 NC: 2026:KHC:48708 CRL.A No. 1411 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1411 OF 2026 BETWEEN: MR MAHESHA V N S/O. NAGESHA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1411 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
MR MAHESHA V N
S/O. NAGESHA,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/O VALAGEREHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 428
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. BASAVARAJU P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
MADDUR POLICE STATION
AND MADDUR TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BENGALURU - 560 001
2.
MR. PRAKASH V.L.
S/O LAKSHMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
R/O VALAGEREHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 428
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1
Digitally signed
by ANNAPURNA
G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
VIDE ORDER DATED 08.09.2026,
R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT
PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET
ASIDE
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DATED 04.08.2026 IN CRL.MISC.NIO.681/2026 PASSED BY IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MANDYA VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
The appellant / accused No.1 has preferred this appeal against the order dated 04.08.2026 passed by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in Crl.Misc.No.681/2026.
2. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1 and perused the materials placed before this Court.
HC-KAR
3. On the basis of the complaint filed by Sri.Prakash V.L., Maddur Police have registered the case in Crime No.247/2026 against accused No.1/appellant and two others for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 115(2),352,351(2),3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (for short, 'the BNS, 2023') and Sections 3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va) of the SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015. The alleged incident took place on 13.06.2026. The complaint came to be filed on 14.07.2026. It is submitted that there is a more than 30 days delay in filing the complaint. It is also submitted that accused No.1 / appellant Sri.Mahesh V.N., had filed a complaint against the present complainant (respondent No.2) Sri.Prakash.V.L., for the commission of offences under Sections 352, 118(1) and 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 and the case was registered in Crime No.205/2026 by Maddur Police. A copy of the FIR and the complaint also filed. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant that Sri.Prakash V.L.,
HC-KAR
who is the accused in Crime No.205/2026 has obtained anticipatory bail on 29.06.2026 from the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in Crl.Misc.No.570/2026. The alleged incident pertaining to the present Crime Nos.247/2026 and 205/2026 are arising out of the same scuffle. However, the trial Court has granted bail to Sri.Prakash.V.L. After obtaining the anticipatory bail, after lapse of about 30 days, the present complainant had been lodged the complaint against the appellant / accused No.1 and others at this stage. There is no proper explanation for the inordinate delay in filing the complaint. Considering the conduct of the complainant, at this stage, I am of the opinion that there are no prima facie materials to constitute the penal provision under the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Oher alleged offences are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life and are exclusively triable by the Court of Magistrates.
HC-KAR
4. The alleged incident took place on 13.06.2026. Till this day, the Investigation Officer has not made any efforts to arrest the appellant / accused No.1. Even after lapse of 54 days from the date of registration of the case, the Investigation Officer has not issued notice to the appellant / accused No.1 as required under Section 35 of the BNS, 2023, for the reasons best known to him.
5. Considering the nature and gravity of the offence, the prior antecedents of the appellant / accused No.1 and the facts and circumstances of the case, I proceed to pass the following order:
ORDER
i. The appeal is allowed;
ii. The order dated 04.08.2026 passed by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in Crl.Misc.No.681/2026 against the appellant/accused No.1 is set aside on the following conditions:
HC-KAR
a. The appellant / accused No.1 shall be released on bail on executing a self bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety for the likesum in the event of arrest by the concerned police in Crime No.247/2026 on the file of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mandya;
b. The appellant / accused No.1 shall cooperate with the Investigation Officer for his investigation.
c. The appellant / accused No.1 shall not indulge in any similar offence.
d. The appellant / accused No.1 shall not tamper or threaten the prosecution witnesses in any manner. Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5