Karnataka High Court
CCC/682/2025 of SRI A ABDUL REHMAN Vs SRI P MANIVANNAN on 8 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010380122025 NC: 2026:KHC:48510-DB CCC No.682 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.682 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.682 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI A.ABDUL REHMAN,
S/O ABDUL RAWOOF,
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
DODABASTHI GRAMA,
RAMASANDRA DAKHALE,
KENGERI HOBLI,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK-560 074.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI VASANTH KUMAR.H.T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI P.MANIVANNAN,
THE COMMISSIONER,
THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
KUMARA PARK WEST,
BENGALURU-560 020.
2.
SRI MANJUNATH DOMBARA,
THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.
3.
SRI RANGAPPA,
THE SURVEYOR,
ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION DIVISION,
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
BENGALURU-560 020.
Digitally
signed by K S
RENUKAMBA
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
4.
SRI RAVIKUMAR,
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
WEST DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX,
VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU-560 040.
5.
SRI BASAVARAJ,
THE SURVEYOR,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WEST DIVISION,
BDA COMPLEX, VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 040.
…ACCUSED
(BY SMT.POONAM S. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR A1; A2, A4 & A5 ARE SERVED UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS
11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE
COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO SECURE THE ACCUSED HEREIN, INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE OF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.10132/2024 (LA-BDA) DATED 09.07.2024 (ANNEXURE-A) AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
Pursuant to the affidavit filed by accused No.1, learned Counsel for the complainant states that survey has been carried out in terms of the order passed by the writ Court in the presence of the complainant. However, it has not been correctly done as per Rules.
HC-KAR
2. When queried, learned Counsel for the complainant fairly states that against the order passed for survey/demarcation, there exists a statutory right of an appeal.
3. In that view of the matter, no cause for maintaining this contempt case subsist. The contempt petition is consigned. It is open for the complainant to seek his statutory remedy strictly in accordance with law.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4