Karnataka High Court
WP/16160/2026 of KISANKRAFT LIMITED Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 8 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010352132026 NC: 2026:KHC:49059 WP No. 16160 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 16160 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: KISANKRAFT LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
WRIT PETITION NO. 16160 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
KISANKRAFT LIMITED
A COMPANY INCORPORATED
UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956
WITH ITS REGISTERED OFFICE ADDRESS
AT NO.4, 1ST MAIN, 7TH A CROSS
MARUTHI LAYOUT, DASARAHALLI
H.A.F POST, HEBBAL, BANGALORE - 560 024
BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. AJITH A. SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
XHGP+C4X, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
SAMPANGI RAMA NAGAR, BENGALURU,
KARNATAKA - 560 009,
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
COMMISSIONERATE OF AGRICULTURE
NO.1, SESHADRI ROAD, NEAR K.R CIRCLE,
OPP. SJP COLLEGE, BENGALURU,
KARNATAKA - 560 009
BY THE COMMISSIONER.
Digitally
signed by
BHARATHI S
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF VIGILANCE,
MYSORE DIVISION,
DISTRICT AGRICULTURE TRAINING CENTRE
NAGANAHALLI, MYSORE - 570 003.
4.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE
UDUPI DISTRICT, RAJATHADRI
UDUPI - 576 104.
5.
SRI T.V. VINODA BABU
S/O VENKATESHAYYA
MAJOR IN AGE
RESIDING AT AGANITHA
NO. 195, NEAR RAMAKRISHNA ITI COLLEGE,
VIVEKANANDA LAYOUT, GOPALA
SHIVAMOGGA - 577 202.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAYYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING
THE
IMPUGNED
NOTICE
DATED
18.06.2025
BEARING
REFERENCE
NUMBER
DDA
(FM
AND
MI)/FM/REP/VIOLATION/KISANKRAFT/2024-25 ISSUED BY THE
R2 AUTHORITY AS PER ANNX-L AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo, which reads as under:
Memo for Withdrawal
“That since the purpose of the present writ petition has been met, the petitioner entity seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the present writ petition as having been rendered infructuous.
Wherefore, the petitioner entity seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the present writ petition in the interest of justice and equity".
Bangalore
Sd/- Dated: 13th August, 2026 Advocate for Petitioner
2. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 157
Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA