Karnataka High Court
CCC/1336/2025 of SRI YOGESH NAIK Vs SRI RAMANDEEP CHOWDHARY IAS on 7 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010676092025 NC: 2026:KHC:48266-DB CCC No. 1336 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1336 OF 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1336 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI. YOGESH NAIK
S/O RUPLA NAIK,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
PRESENTLY WORKING AS DRIVER,
OFFICE OF MALENADU AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD,
SHIMOGA 577 201.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. BASAVARAJA PATEL.G.K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. RAMANDEEP CHOWDHARY., I.A.S.,
SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION AND STATISTICS
M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.
…ACCUSED
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTATION AND STATISTICS
M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.
…PROFORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH.B.G., AGA FOR PROFORMA R2 &
A1)
Digitally signed by
SUMATHY KANNAN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO
INITIATE APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED
FOR THE WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE AND CONTEMPT SHOWN TO
THE ORDER DATED 09.06.2025 MADE IN WP NO.15767/2022
VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
&
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
A compliance affidavit has been filed today in Court by the learned AGA appearing for the accused. The compliance affidavit is sworn by Dr. Thrilokchandra K.V. serving as Secretary, Department of Planning, Programme Monitoring and Statistics.
2. It is stated that pursuant to the order of this Court, the claim of the complainant / petitioner was considered by the competent authority and after examining the entire matter and the records, a reasoned
HC-KAR
order dated 12.08.2026 was passed. Paragraph 5 reads as follows: “5. I state that after examining the entire matter and the relevant records, the competent authority has passed a speaking and reasoned order No.PDS/197/SMC.2025 Dated 12.08.2026 (Sri Yogeesh Naik K.R., driver (daily wages) Malenadu Area Development Board, after service as a driver (daily wages) driver for 10 years from 01.01.1995, that is, from 01.01.2005 onwards, the Malenadu Area Development Board has ordered to regularize his service in the post of driver) on the representation of the Petitioner. Copy of the proceedings of the Government Order dated 12.08.2026 along with English Translation is produced herewith as Annexure- R1.”
3. Apology and explanation is tendered in paragraph Nos.7 to 11 of the compliance affidavit.
4. We have perused the Government order that is enclosed as Annexure-“R1”. The operative part of the Government order reads as follows: “Government
Order
No. PDS/197/SMC/2025, Bengaluru, dated: 12/08/2026.
In the background of the facts explained in the proposal, it is ordered by regularizing the service of Sri. Yogeesh Naik K.R., driver on daily wages basis in the post of Driver in the Malenadu Area Development Board, with effect from 01.01.2005, i.e., after he completed the service of 10 years as a Driver on daily wages basis from 01.01.1995.
HC-KAR
Since this case is considered in the background of the orders passed by the Hon’ble High Court and Supreme Court, the said case shall not be taken as an instance for any other cases.
By order and in the name of the Governor of Karnataka, Sd/- (B. Dayananda) Under Secretary (S-5) to Government, (Administration and Co-ordination), Department of Planning, Programme Monitoring and Statistics.”
5. In view of the aforesaid, the order of the writ court has been complied with.
6. The petition is consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15