Karnataka High Court
CCC/127/2026 of SMT V LALITHA Vs SMT. ASHWINI J on 7 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010071642026 NC: 2026:KHC:48279-DB CCC No. 127 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 127 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 127 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. V.LALITHA
W/O PAPAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT ARALASANDRA KASABA HOBLI,
MADALA KOTE POST,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 123.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SMT. ARCHISHMA.S.KALLURAYA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. ASHWINI.J
THE TAHSILDAR,
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,
BANGALORE-560 009.
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
…ACCUSED
(BY SMT. SUKANYA BALIGA.B., AGA FOR PROFORMA R2 & A1)
Digitally signed by
SUMATHY KANNAN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING THE HON’BLE COURT TO INITIATE CONTEMPT
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH THEM IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR HAVING WILLFULLY DISOBEYED
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.29144/2025 (KLR-RES) DATED 24.09.2025 (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI & HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
The counsel for the complainant states that the order of the writ court was complied and the applications of the complainant / petitioner were rejected by an order, which order was the subject matter of an unsuccessful challenge in a writ petition by the complainant.
2. Therefore, it is evident that no cause for pressing the contempt survives.
HC-KAR
3. This petition is consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22