Karnataka High Court
WP/26686/2026 of SMT MEGHANA CHANDRA REDDY Vs SRI MUNIYAMMA on 7 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010593042026 NC: 2026:KHC:48612 WP No. 26686 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 26686 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT MEGHANA CHANDRA REDDY D/O NARAYANA CHANDRA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
WRIT PETITION NO. 26686 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT MEGHANA CHANDRA REDDY
D/O NARAYANA CHANDRA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.17, 30TH MAIN,
BTM LAYOUT 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU 560 076.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI S. SREEVATSA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI ALOKE MADAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI MUNIYAMMA
WIFE OF LATE CHOWDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS,
2.
SRI. BYRAPPA
S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
3.
SRI. MC KRISHNAMURTHY,
S/O LARE CHOWDAPPA,
Digitally signed
by VINUTHA B
S
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
MINDAHALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT 563 130.
4.
SMT. SUNANDAMMA,
D/O LATE CHOWDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
RESIDING AT MARALAKUNTE VILLAGE,
JALA HOBLI, YALAHANKA HOBLI,
BENGALURU 560 157.
5.
SMT. JALAJAKSHI
W/O LATE LAKSHMANA MURTHY D.
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
6.
SRI. MADHU KUMAR L
S/O LATE LAKSHMANA MURTY D
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
7.
SRI. L MANAS KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
S/O LATE LAKSHMANA MURTY D
8.
SMT. RAMAKKA,
D/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH
AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS,
HC-KAR
9.
SMT. RUKMINIYAMMA
D/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH
AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
DODDA HULLURU VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK,
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT
KARNATAKA 562 114
10.
SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA,
D/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.
RESIDING AT NO. 146,
6TH CROSS, VAPASANDRA,
CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101
11.
SMT. SHANKUNTHALA,
D/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
RESIDING AT ITTAGALAPURA VILLAGE,
RAJANUKUNTE POST,
HESARAGHATTA HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH TALIK,
12.
SMT. SUMITHRAMMA
D/O LATE DODDAPPAIAH
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NADIPINAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SHIDLAGATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, CHIKKABALLAPURA 562 102.
13.
SMT. MEGHANA L.,
D/O LATE LAKSHMANAMURTHY D.,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
RESIDING AT DODDAHULLURU VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(VIDE ORDER DATED 07.09.2026 NOTICE
TO RESPONDENTS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE
HON'BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL
TO DISPOSE OF THE INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION BEARING
IA NO.5 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE
4 OF THE CPC IN OS NO.71/2025 PENDING BEFORE THE
HON'BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HOSKOTE, BENGALURU RURAL, WITHIN A PERIOD OF 2 WEEKS OR SUCH OTHER TIME FIXED
BY THIS HON'BLE COURT (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri S. Sreevatsa, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri Aloke Madappa, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The limited grievance raised in the present petition is that the trial Court passed an ex parte ad interim order of status quo on 25.01.2025, which continues to remain in force till date.
2.1 It is submitted that, on 27.10.2025, I.A.No.V was filed under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC, seeking to set aside the ex parte ad interim order of status quo. It is further submitted that the trial Court has heard the arguments of learned counsel for both the parties on the said application. However, no orders have yet been passed thereon.
3. This Court finds no justifiable reason as to why orders have not been passed on the application filed on 27.10.2025 till date. It is submitted that the next date of hearing before the trial Court is 16.09.2026. The trial Court is directed to dispose of I.A.No.V within a period of two weeks from the said date.
HC-KAR
4. In view of the limited directions issued herein, notice to the respondents is dispensed with. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43