Karnataka High Court
WP/22841/2021 of DR. N. RAMA RAO Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 7 September 2026
2023:KHC:44536-DB WP No. 22841 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 22841 OF 2021 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: DR. N. RAMA RAO S/O
NC: 2023:KHC:44536-DB
WP No. 22841 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
WRIT PETITION NO. 22841 OF 2021 (S-KSAT)
BETWEEN:
DR. N. RAMA RAO
S/O LATE Y.N. LAKSHMINARAYANA RAO
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS
RETD. PRINCIPAL GRADE-II
R/AT NO. 46/4, EAST PARK ROAD
17TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM
BENGALURU-560 055. …PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. MANJUNATH G. KANDEKAR, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
TO GOVERNMENT
(COLLEGIATE EDUCATION)
M.S. BUILDING
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER OF
COLLEGIATE EDUCATION
2ND FLOOR, DTE BUILDING
PALACE ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
3.
THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, KARNATAKA
(A AND E), PARK HOUSE
BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS
AND ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE ORDER
Digitally signed
by ANUSHA V
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:44536-DB
WP No. 22841 of 2021
PASSED
BY
THE
HONBLE
TRIBUNAL
IN
APPLICATION
NO.7712/2016 DATED 29/06/2020 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ALLOW
THE A.NO.7712/2016 AND ETC.
THIS
W.P.,
COMING
ON
FOR
ORDERS,
THIS
DAY,
P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This appeal is of the year 2021 and it is listed for fifth time for non-compliance of office objections. None appears for the petitioner. Despite peremptory order, office objections have not been complied with. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition.
In the circumstance, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. In view of disposal of this petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and they stand disposed of.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
AV/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16