Karnataka High Court
WP/21534/2025 of SUTRAM SURESH Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 2 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010475372025 NC: 2026:KHC:47975 WP No. 21534 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21534 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SUTRAM SURESH S/O S.R. SHANKARA RAMAIAH, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 21534 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SUTRAM SURESH
S/O S.R. SHANKARA RAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT A-1505, BRIGADE GATEWAY,
MALLESHWARAM WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 055.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SMT. MONICA PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BANSHANKARI POLICE,
EOD/CID, BENGALURU - 560 070.
2.
SRI. P.R. BALAJI
S/O LATE RADHAKRISHNA GUPTA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT NO.88/77,
SHIVARAMKARANTH ROAD,
CHIKKALASANDRA,
BENGALURU - 560 061.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESHA, SPP-I FOR R1)
Digitally
signed by
CHETAN B C
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC.528 OF THE BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN SPL.C. NO.
769/2024 PENDING ON THE FILES OF THE PRINCIPAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BANGALORE AND SPL. COURT
FOR KPIDFE ACT, AT BENGALURU (CCH-1) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri.Kiran S. Javali, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2. After arguing the matter at length, the learned Senior Counsel seek leave of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file application seeking discharge before the concerned Court.
3. In the light of the aforesaid submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed with liberty to urge all the contentions that are now projected, before the Concerned Court.
HC-KAR
4. In the event, the petitioner want to file application seeking discharge, it is needless to observe that the concerned Court shall consider all aspects and pass necessary orders, in accordance with law.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
MCR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 107