Karnataka High Court
CCC/297/2026 of M. P. RAJANNA Vs DR. SHALINI RAJNEESH on 2 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010174962026 NC: 2026:KHC:47861-DB CCC No. 297 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 297 OF 2026 BETWEEN: M. P.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 297 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
M. P. RAJANNA,
S/O. LATE D. M. PARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/AT HOUSE NO. 388,
ANR CHOULTRY ROAD,
NEAR YELLAMMA TEMPLE,
BANAHALLI, CHANDAPUR POST,
BENGALURU - 560 081.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. H. KANTHARAJA SR. ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. RAVI H.K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
DR. SHALINI RAJNEESH,
THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SRI. RAGHUNANDAN MURTHY,
COMMISSIONER OF TREASURIES,
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF TREASURIES,
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
KPCL GREEN BUILDING,
NO. 3, PALACE ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
3.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…ACCUSED
(BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA FOR
PROFORMA R3, A1 AND A2)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT,1971, PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE
COURT BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH THEM FOR WILFUL
DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED:22.09.2025 PASSED IN
W.P.NO.6387/2022 (S-KAT) AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
Heard learned counsel for the complainant and learned AGA appearing for the State. This contempt case is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 22.09.2025 passed in W.P.No.6387/2022. The claim of the petitioner was for reservation in promotion for 'Persons with Benchmark Disabilities' under the provisions of the Right of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER vs NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND AND ANOTHER1.
2. After noticing that the State Administrative Tribunal ought to have directed the Competent Authority to consider the petitioner's representation in accordance with law and setting aside the order dated 20.12.2021 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru, the Respondent - Authorities were directed to 1 (2013) 10 SCC 2021
HC-KAR
consider the representation dated 06.11.2021. A representation dated 30.10.2025 was sent to the respondents.
3. Learned AGA has filed an Affidavit of Sri.Raghunandan Murthy, Commissioner of Treasuries, Bengaluru, which reflects that the representation of the petitioner/complainant was rejected by means of the Endorsement dated 18.03.2026. In our considered opinion, the order of the Writ Court has been complied with. It is for the complainant to seek appropriate remedy, if so advised, against the order dated 18.03.2026. The contempt case is consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19