Karnataka High Court
WP/25725/2026 of M/S S L M MOTORS LTD., Vs SMT. B S SARVAMANGALA on 1 September 2026
CNR: KAHC010566992026 NC: 2026:KHC:47600 WP No. 25725 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 25725 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S S.L.M. MOTORS LTD., CARRYING ON ITS
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 25725 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
M/S S.L.M. MOTORS LTD.,
CARRYING ON ITS BUSINESS AT
NO. A 604, 5TH FLOOR,
RAMANA JYOTHI APARTMENTS,
OPP. CMTI, TUMKUR ROAD,
YESHWANTHPURA,
BENGALURU
REPRESENTED BY ITS
MANAGING DIRECTOR,
SRI. M SHANKAR,
S/O SRI. T.C.MARAIAH
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
NOTE. COMPANY REGISTERED
UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAGAR B.B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. B.S.SARVAMANGALA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
W/O LATE N.R SHANKAR,
REPRESENTED BY
HER GPA HOLDER,
SRI. S GOUTHAM,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
S/O LATE N.R SHANKAR,
R/AT NO.46, B.M ROAD,
SHESHAGIRIHALLI,
BIDADI HOBLI,
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
RAMANAGARA TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT- 562 109
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.PARASHURAM A.L., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED
11.05.2023 PASSED ON I.A NO.3 IN COM. O.S NO. 02/2023 BY
HONBLE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT
RAMANAGARA VIDE ANNEXURE C, FILED FOR DISPENSATION
OF THE PRE-INSTITUTION MEDIATION UNDER SECTION 12A
OF COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT VIDE ANNEXURE B2, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.3 in COM.OS.No.02/2023 dated 11.05.2023 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanagara, whereby the trial Court had dispensed with Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the plaintiff is before this Court.
2. When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file an appropriate petition under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC before the Commercial
HC-KAR
Court. Considering the same, this Court is passing the following:
ORDER
i. The writ petition is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC and the court shall consider the same in accordance with law.
ii. In the light of the settled law, this order will not come in the way of the petitioner in filing an application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC
iii. Pending I.As in the petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI)
JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 75