Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/11146/2026 of PRUTHVIRAJ Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010509112026 NC: 2026:KHC:47607 CRL.P No. 11146 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11146 OF 2026 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. PRUTHVIRAJ S/O

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11146 OF 2026

(482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)

BETWEEN:

1.

PRUTHVIRAJ

S/O DORAIRAJ,

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

R/AT NO. NA1G1, NETHRAVATHI BLOCK,

VIJAYA BANK ENCLAVE, BILEKAHALLI,

BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD,

BENGALURU 560076.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. YADUNANDAN N.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY CHIKKAJALA POLICE STATION,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,

REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SMT RAHSMI PATEL, HCGP)

CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) BY

THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS

HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE

CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.10198/2022 PENDING ON

THE FILE OF THE HONBLE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C

DEVANAHALLI FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 5,21,24 OF

Digitally

signed by

CHETAN B C

Location:

High Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

THE CIGARETTES AND OTHER TOBACCO PRODUCTS ACT 2003

SEC.188,278,290,291 OF THE IPC AND SEC.102 AND 103 OF

THE KARNATAKA POLICE ACT 1963 ARISING OUT OF

CR.NO.43/2022

(FIR.NO.194/2022)

REGISTERED

BY

CHIKKAJALA P.S. IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER / ACCUSED

NO.1 IS CONCERNED

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The Petitioner is before the court calling in question the proceedings in C.C.No.10198/2022, pending on the file of the learned Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, for the offences punishable under Sections 5, 21, and 24 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, Sections 188, 278, 290 and 291 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 102 and 103 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, arising out of Crime No.43/2022 (FIR No.194/2022) registered by Chikkajala Police Station.

2. The proceedings is of the year 2022. When a Government Order which banned hookah under the COTP

HC-KAR

Act, was not yet in force, the proceedings had commenced then. The petitioner challenges the said proceeding in C.C.No.10198/2022.

3. In the light of the ban of hookah, this court directed the petitioner to file an affidavit of undertaking that he would not sell hukkah in the premises. The affidavit is filed and it reads as follows: AFFIDAVIT "1, Sri. Pruthviraj, S/o Sri. Durairaj, aged about 34 years, R/at No. NA1G1, Nethravathi Block, Vijaya Bank Enclave, Bilekahalli, Bannerghatta Main Road, Bengaluru - 560076, at presently D-406, Renaissance Temple Bells apt, Yeshwanthpur, bengaluru-560022, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as follows:

1 That I am the Petitioner in the above Criminal Petition, I am swearing to this affidavit, and I am well acquainted with the facts of the case.

2 I state that I have been arrayed as Accused No.1 in C.C.No.10198/2022 arising out of Crime No.43/2022 registered by Chikkajala Police Station is pending on the file of the Hon'ble II Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 5, 21 and 24 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, Sections 188, 278, 290 and 291 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 102 and 103 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963.

3. I state that I have filed the above criminal petition challenging the entire proceedings in C.C.No.10198/2022 pending on the file of the Hon'ble II Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli.

HC-KAR

4. I state that this Hon'ble court by order dated 24.08.2026 directed me to file an affidavit in respect of service of hukkah after the State Government imposed a ban of the same. Hence this affidavit.

5. I state that while the above crime was registered, there was no ban on hukkah and there were no restraint or regulation of the same. I state that subsequently, the State Government brought in regulation and banned the same. I state that we have not served hookah and other products subsequent to ban of the same."

4. In the light of the ban itself of hukkah and the affidavit of the petitioner that he would abide by the provisions of law as a matter of fact, the petition is allowed. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

i) The petition is allowed.

ii) The impugned proceedings in C.C.No.

10198/2022 arising out of Crime No.43/2022

registered by Chikkajala Police Station, pending on the file of the learned Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, qua the petitioner, is hereby quashed.

Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

HR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead