Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/1255/2026 of SRI. M.S NATARAJ Vs SRI. K N CHANDRASHEKAR on 31 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010545512026 NC: 2026:KHC:47130 CRL.RP No. 1255 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1255 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI M S NATARAJ C/O R SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010545512026
NC: 2026:KHC:47130
CRL.RP No. 1255 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1255 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SRI M S NATARAJ
C/O R SRINIVASA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.182, D ZONRE VITAL DHAMA, J P NAGAR, MYSURU-570 031.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI VIDYASAGAR H. V., ADVOCATE, FOR
SRI KEMPARAJU AND SMT. RAKSHA KEERTHANA K.)
AND:
SRI K N CHANDRASHEKAR
S/O LATE G R SRIKANTAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
RESIDING AT LABOUR COLONY,
3RD CROSS, RAMA MANDIRA,
MANDYA CITY - 571 401.
…RESPONDENT
* * *
THIS
CRIMINAL
REVISION
PETITION
IS
FILED
UNDER
SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE, 1973, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 24.07.2026 PASSED
BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MANDYA, IN CRIMINAL APPEAL
NO.60 OF 2025 AND THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION
AND SENTENCE DATED 04.03.2025 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL
JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MALAVALLI, IN
CRIMINAL CASE NO.1073 OF 2015.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed
by
NAGARATHNA
M
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010545512026
NC: 2026:KHC:47130
CRL.RP No. 1255 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled the matter out of the Court and hence, he prays to withdraw the revision petition. In support of his submission, he has filed a memo.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the submission and memo, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of dismissal of the revision petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand dismissed.
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
KVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39