Karnataka High Court
CCC/100/2026 of SMT ANASUYAMMA K S Vs MAJOR MANIVANNAN P on 31 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010056282026 NC: 2026:KHC:47201-DB CCC No. 100 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. ANASUYAMMA.K.S.
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
W/O K.S.SUBRAMANYA SHETTY,
R/A NO.10, 1ST MAIN ROAD, PAPAIAH GARDEN, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 079.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. J.M.RAJANNA SETTY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MAJOR. MANIVANNAN.P
THE COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU -560 020.
2.
MAMATHA KUMARI
THE SPECIAL ADDITIONAL LAND
ACQUISITION OFFICER,
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU -560 020.
3.
UMESH. D.S.
THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-I
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU -560 020.
…ACCUSED
(BY SRI. M.V.CHARATI., ADVOCATE A1 TO A3)
Digitally signed by
SUMATHY
KANNAN
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE
COURT BE PLEASED TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED
PERSONS
FOR
DISOBEYING
THE
ORDERS
PASSED
IN
W.P.NO.6990/2021 (BDA) ON 17.03.2025 ON THE FILE OF
THIS HON’BLE COURT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED BY PASSING
AN ORDER OF IMPRISONMENT AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEM
FIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FRAMING OF CHARGE, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
&
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
A compliance affidavit has been filed today by the complainant. Another compliance affidavit has been filed by the accused.
2. The learned counsel for the complainant states that the relinquishment deed in favour of the Bengaluru Development Authority (B.D.A.), has been executed and the original documents surrendered in respect of his property in Site No.63, carved out of Survey No.34/4 of Mallathahalli Village, Yashwanthpura Taluk on 20.08.2026.
HC-KAR
3. It has further stated that BDA has executed a sale deed in his favour in respect of Site No.604, Sri.M.Visheshwaraiah Layout, 9th Block and also issued possession certificate on 29.08.2026. It is stated that the directions of the Court has been fully implemented in letter and spirit. It is also evident from the compliance affidavit of the complainant that an amount of Rs.6,97,464/- has been paid by her on 19.08.2026.
4. A similar affidavit has also been filed by the accused.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the contempt case is consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE JJ / List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42