Karnataka High Court

WA/1975/2026 of KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARDA FEDERAL Vs DR. VIRUPAXI on 31 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010581622026 NC: 2026:KHC:47035-DB WA No. 1975 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 1975 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN:

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

WRIT APPEAL NO. 1975 OF 2026 (CS-RES)

BETWEEN:

1.

KARNATAKA STATE SOUHARDA FEDERAL

CO-OPERATIVE LTD., HAVING ITS

REGISTERED OFFICE AT, NO.68TH, 18TH CROSS

REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

SRI SHARANGOUDA

S/O GURUBASAPPA PATIL

AGE 45 YEARS

OCC: MANAGING DIRECTOR

R/O NO.68TH, 18TH CROSS

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI SRINAND ARAVIND PACHAPURE, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

DR. VIRUPAXI

S/O SHIVALINGAPPA SADHUNAVAR

AGE 74 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS

R/O MRUTYUNJAY NAGAR

TQ: BAILHONGAL

DIST: BELAGAVI - 591 102

Digitally

signed by

VEERENDRA

KUMAR K M

Location:

High Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

2.

SHRI KIRAN

S/O VIRUPAXISADHUNAVAR

AGE 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS

R/O MRUTYUNJAY NAGAR

TQ: BAILHONGAL

DIST: BELAGAVI - 591 102

3.

THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

NO.1, ALI ASKER ROAD, VASANT NAGAR

BENGALURU - 560 001

4.

DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

(N-441) DAWA PANCHYAT COURT

KARNATAKA RAJAYA SOUHARDA SAMYUKTA

SAHAKARI NIYAMITHA

NO.68, 17TH AND 18TH CROSS

5.

THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY

REP. BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

BELAGAVI SUB-DIVISION

BELAGAVI - 590 001

6.

KITTUR RANI CHENNAMMA URBAN CREDIT

SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITA

MRUTHANJAYA NAGAR

BELAGAVI ROAD

BAILHONGAL - 591 102

REP. BY ITS CEO/IN-CHARGE

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

SRI SAMIT PARVATIKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1 & 2; SRI K.S. HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R-3 TO R-5)

HC-KAR

THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

ORDER DATED 04.08.2026 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE

JUDGE IN WRIT PETITION No.3602/2026 (CS-RES) ON ISSUE OF

MAINTAINABILITY OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED WRIT PETITION &

ETC.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

and

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 04.08.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.3602/2026 (CS-RES), whereby the appellant's challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court is rejected.

2. It is the appellant's case that the subject controversy arises in the district of Belagavi, inasmuch as the proceedings have been initiated by the appellant before the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies in respect of the entire subject matter, records, and accounts originating within the District of Belagavi. Thus, the Dharwad Bench of this Court would have the necessary jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition.

HC-KAR

3. The appellant made a complaint to the Deputy Registrar of Co- operative Societies, Bengaluru regarding certain misconduct in regard to the affairs of Kittur Rani Chennamma Urban Credit Souharda Sahakari Niyamita (respondent No.6), which is operating in Belagavi and an application under Section 37A of the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997 (Surcharge application) was filed.

4. It is stated that all the inspections were conducted in Belagavi. Since the writ petitioner seeks to challenge the action initiated in regard to the said entity (respondent No.6), which is located in Belagavi in addition to the contention that respondent No.6 is located in Belgavi, it is stated that certain directors have filed petitions which are being considered by the Dharwad Bench of this Court. It is in the aforesaid context that the appellant had raised an objection as to the jurisdiction of the learned Single Judge of the Principal Bench to hear the said petitions.

5. The learned Single Judge noted that part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court. The order which is sought to be impugned in this writ petition was passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies which is located in Bengaluru.

HC-KAR

The writ petitioner had also challenged the proceedings that were initiated by the appellant before the concerned authority in Bengaluru.

6. In view of the above, the learned Single Judge rejected the petitioner’s contention that the Court did not have any jurisdiction to entertain the petition.

7. We find no infirmity with the said order. Insofar as the contention that there would be different Courts dealing with connected matters is concerned, the same is a matter of forum conveniens and not the jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the petition. It is also open for the appellant to avail of appropriate remedy to seek clubbing of the said petitions. However, we are unable to accept that the Single Judge sitting at Principal Bench does not have jurisdiction to entertain the same.

8. The appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observations.

9. Pending applications stand disposed of.

Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE KMV/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead