Karnataka High Court
WP/23166/2023 of UNION OF INDIA Vs A MOHAN BABU on 31 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010549832023 NC: 2026:KHC:47271 WP No. 23166 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A . PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 23166 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY DIVISIONAL
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
WRIT PETITION NO. 23166 OF 2023 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY
DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (WORKS),
SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY,
BENGALURU - 560 023.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER / NORTH
BENGALURU DIVISION,
SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY,
BENGALURU - 560 023.
3.
THE GENERAL MANAGER
SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY CLUB ROAD,
HUBBALLI - 580 031.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KUMAR M.N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
A. MOHAN BABU
SON OF SRI BHASKARA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
RESIDING AT 1/P, OILEMOL,
RAMNATH COLONY, SAO JOSE AREAL (VP),
SALCETE, GOA - 403 709.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SAMPATH BAPAT, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by
ANNAPURNA G
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DTD 06.10.2023 PASSED IN COM.EXECUTION NO.384/2023 BY THE C/C LXXXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-89) (COMMERCIAL COURT) VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The memo reads as under: "Petitioners respectfully state that, in view of the interim order passed in COMAP No.228/2023 between the petitioners and the respondent by the Hon'ble Divisional Bench of this Hon'ble Court on 28/08/2026 staying operation and execution of the arbitral award dated 10/11/2021, in respect of claims No.2, 8 and 10, this writ is infructuous. Wherefore, petitioners most respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioners to withdraw the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice."
HC-KAR
3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41