Karnataka High Court
RP/104/2024 of SMT MUNIYAMMA Vs M/S KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE SOC. LTD., on 29 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010155722024 NC: 2026:KHC:46948 RP No. 104 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REVIEW PETITION NO. 104 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNIYAMMA, W/O SRI. KAVERAPPA, SINCE DECEASED BY LRS Y.G.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
REVIEW PETITION NO. 104 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. MUNIYAMMA,
W/O SRI. KAVERAPPA,
SINCE DECEASED BY LRS
Y.G. RAMAKRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
S/O LATE KAVERAPPA,
NO. 209, 7TH CROSS,
A.K COLONY,
NEAR GAENSA TEMPLE,
KAVEERAPPA BUILDING
YAMALUR
BENGALURU - 560 037.
2.
GOWRAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
W/O Y. GOPAL,
NO. 209, 7TH CROSS,
A.K COLONY,
NEAR GAENSA TEMPLE,
KAVEERAPPA BUILDING
YAMALUR
BENGALURU - 560 037.
P1 AND P2 REP BY ITS
GPA HOLDER FOR
PETITIONER NO.3
Digitally signed
by
REKHA R
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
3.
K. RAMAMURTHY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
S/O LATE KAVERAPPA,
R/AT NO. 5, 19TH CROSS,
KAVERAPPA BUILDING,
RAMESH NAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 037.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
M/S. KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY
BOARD EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE SOC. LTD.,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
ANANDA RAO CIRCLE,
RACE COURSE ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 009.
REP BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
SRI. K.P. CHAMPAKADHAMASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
S/O LATE PUTTASWAMY,
R/AT NO. 161/64, 8TH MAIN,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU - 560 003.
3.
M/S GOLDEN GATE PROJECTS,
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING
ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 96,
1ST FLOOR, 4TH 'B' BLOCK,
KORAMANGALA EXTENSION,
BENGALURU - 560 034.
REP BY ITS PARTNER.
HC-KAR
4.
M/S KEYA HOMES PVT., LTD.,
A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY
INCORPORATED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANY'S ACT
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO. 17,
REGENT COURT 17, 80 FEET ROAD,
NEW FRIENDS COLONY,
KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU - 560 034.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHESWAR J., ADVOCATE FOR R1, SRI. VENKATESH R., ADVOCATE FOR R3, SRI. G.S. KANNUR, SR ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. MOHAMMED AFROZE, ADVOCATE FOR R4,
R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE
1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, 1908, PRAYING THAT THIS
HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.312/2021 ON THE FILE OF THIS
HON'BLE COURT AND REVIEW THE ORDER DATED:31.10.2023
AND SET ASIDE THE FINDING RECORDED DURING THE
COURSE OF JUDGMENT AND DECREE INASMUCH AS THE ISSUE
RELATED TO THE QUESTION OF LIMITATION, IN THE ABOVE
CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo, seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the review petition. The memo is accepted and the same reads as under:
"The undersigned counsel for petitioners seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the above captioned suit with the liberty to see clarity before the Ho'b'e Supreme Court in the Special Leave Petition already disposed off"
2. In view of the above memo, this review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner may take re-course, if they are so entitled in law if they so advised.
3. Since review petition itself is withdrawn, pending applications if any, does not survive for consideration and the same stand disposed of.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8 ct-vn