Karnataka High Court
CRP/554/2025 of SRI. G SHANKAR Vs M/S SOUTH INDIA WATCH COMPANY PVT LTD., on 29 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010505812025 NC: 2026:KHC:47205 CRP No. 554 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 554 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI. G. SHANKAR, S/O G. GURUSWAMY, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 554 OF 2025 (IO)
BETWEEN:
SRI. G. SHANKAR,
S/O G. GURUSWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDING AT E/675,
MANJUNATHA LAYOUT, T.C.PALYA,
BANGALORE – 560 036.
MOBILE: 9008403684.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. C.S PRASANNA KUMAR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
M/S. SOUTH INDIA WATCH
COMPANY PVT. LTD.,
A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
AT NO.39, KRISHNAREDDY LAYOUT,
DOMMALURU,
BENGALURU – 560 071,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
SRI. NEERAJ HARLALKA.
2.
SMT. LAKSHMI DEVI,
W/O LATE SRINIVAS,
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
RESIDING AT NO.68,
MARIYAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, BANASWADI,
BANGALORE – 560 043.
3.
SRI. MANIKANTA,
S/O LATE SRINIVASA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.68,
MARIYAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, BANASWADI,
BANGALORE – 560 043.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VENKATESH R BHAGAT, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 22.07.2025 PASSED ON IA NO.3 IN OS
NO.1/2024 ON THE FILE OF III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE,
BENGALURU
RURAL
DISTRICT,
BENGALURU,
REJECTING THE IA NO.3 FILED U/O 7 RULE 11(d) OF CPC FOR
REJECTION OF PLAINT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, stating that the parties have entered into compromise before the Trial Court in OS.No.1/2024.
HC-KAR
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20