Karnataka High Court
WP/667/2023 of MR MUDDURANGAPPA Vs ANRIYA GREINBERG APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION on 29 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010023512023 NC: 2026:KHC:46928 W.P. No.667/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A . PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.667/2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MR. MUDDURANGAPPA S/O HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
WRIT PETITION NO.667/2023 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. MUDDURANGAPPA
S/O HANUMANTAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
2.
Ms. MEGHANA MUDDURANGAPPA
D/O Mr. MUDDURANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/O OF FLAT NO.1002
'ANRIYA GREINBERG' APARTMENTS
13TH 'A' CROSS, 8TH MAIN
ALLALASANDRA
NEAR JUDICIAL LAYOUT
ALSO AT NO.2097, 8TH MAIN
2ND CROSS, JUDICIAL LAYOUT
YELAHANKA,
BANGALORE-560 065.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. RASHMI M.R. ADV., [ABSENT])
Digitally signed
by RUPA V
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
ANRIYA GREINBERG APARTMENT OWNERS
ASSOCIATION
NO.95/2, 13TH 'A' CROSS, 8TH MAIN
ALLALASANDRA, NEAR JUDICIAL LAYOUT
GKVK POST, YELAHANKA
BANGALORE-560 065
REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT
MR. R. MAHENDRA SINGH
S/O RAMA SINGH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
R/AT FLAT NO.2204
'ANRIYA GREINBERG' APARTMENTS
NO.95/2, 13TH 'A' CROSS, 8TH MAIN
ALLALASANDRA, NEAR JUDICIAL LAYOUT
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRADEEP NAIK K, ADV.,)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15.12.2022 (ANNEXURE A )PASSED
ON I.A. NO. 1 BY THE XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH- 18) IN O,S NO.867/2021 & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 27.08.2026. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session.
It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35