Karnataka High Court
RP/223/2026 of SMT. NALINI SUSHMA. M. S. Vs MOHAMMED KHADIR UR RAHMAN on 28 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010289312026 NC: 2026:KHC:46659 RP No. 223 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REVIEW PETITION NO.223 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NALINI SUSHMA M.S. W/O SANDIL KUMAR . A AGED ABOUT 42
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
REVIEW PETITION NO.223 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. NALINI SUSHMA M.S.
W/O SANDIL KUMAR .A
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
2.
SRI SANDAL KUMAR .A
S/O LATE ANANTHAPADMANABHA RAO,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
NO.204, 'B' BLOCK,
ELEGANT PRIDE APARTMENT,
4TH CROSS, TELECOM LAYOUT,
NEXT TO GOVERNMENT SCHOOL,
SRIRAMPURA, JAKKUR P.O.,
BENGALURU-560 064.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. YOGITHA MUDAKANNAVAR, ADVOCATE, FOR
SRI. KRISHNAMURTHY M.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MOHAMMED KHADIR UR RAHMAN
S/O MOHAMMED ZABI UR RAHMAN,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
FLAT NO.408, COMER RIDGE GKS,
6TH MAIN ROAD, HBR LAYOUT,
BENGALURU-560 043.
PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT
NO.946, AMMAVARAPETE,
Digitally signed
by C K LATHA
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
KALAYIPETE, KOLAR-563 101.
2.
SMT. USHA MANOJ KUMAR,
W/O MANOJ KUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
3.
MANOJ KUMAR G.S.
S/O LATE SHIVAJIRAO G.H.,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NOS.2 & 3 ARE
RESIDING AT NO.109,
DEEKSHA, 5TH CROSS,
BEHIND GKW LAYOUT
BUS STAND, HBCS LAYOUT,
VYALIKAVAL, BENGALURU-560 040.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1
R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER
PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN M.F.A.NO.1904/2026 DATED
17.03.2026.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the review petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal of the review petition. The memo reads as under :
HC-KAR
“Memo for withdrawal
“It is submitted that the petitioners and the respondents have settled the original suit before the trial court. Hence the above petition has become infructuous. Wherefore the petitioners pray that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit them to withdraw the above petition, in the interest of justice. “
2. In view of the memo, the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
CKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1