Karnataka High Court
RFA/969/2025 of SRI V K RAMAMURTHY Vs BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY on 28 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010256902025 NC: 2026:KHC:46523 RFA No. 969 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 969 OF 2025 (MON) BETWEEN: SRI. V K RAMAMURTHY S/O KUPPUSAMY, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 969 OF 2025 (MON)
BETWEEN:
SRI. V K RAMAMURTHY
S/O KUPPUSAMY,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
R/O NO. 10, 1ST FLOOR,
2ND MAIN 'C' ROAD, 8TH BLOCK,
KORAMANGALA LAYOUT,
BENGALURU – 560 095.
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT. SWATHI MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE.
…RESPONDENT
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.09.2024 PASSED IN
OS NO.9672/2015 ON THE FILE OF XV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT BENGALURU AND ETC.,
Digitally
signed by
THEJAS
KUMAR N
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 20.07.2026 to withdraw the appeal, which reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The counsel for petitioner humbly submits as follows: The petitioner has filed the said RFA.No.969/2025, and the present stage is for the compliance for the office objections, for the payment of the Court fees, and the petitioner is a senior citizen and he is unable to pay the Court fees, and hence he has written a letter to the Chief Justice in order to waive off the Court fees payable to this Hon'ble Court, and thus I am withdrawing the present case and permit the petitioner to file a fresh suit via High Court Legal Aid Services, I pray before this Court to take this Memo on record in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Accepting the said memo and submission of learned counsel for the appellant is taken on record.
HC-KAR
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12