Karnataka High Court
CEA/22/2026 of M D PATIL Vs THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE on 27 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010293732026 NC: 2026:KHC:46306-DB CEA No. 22 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2026 BETWEEN: M.D. PATIL
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 22 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
M.D. PATIL
(ALSO KNOWN AS
MANJUNATH DEVENDRAGOWDA PATIL)
SON OF MR. D.S. PATIL
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
RESIDING AT VILLA 330, 5TH LANE
ADARSH PALM RETREAT
BELLANDUR, BENGALURU-560 103.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI SRIVATSA RAO, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL
EXCISE, BANGALORE-III
COMMISSIONERATE
C.R. BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI ARAVIND V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE)
THIS CEA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 35G OF THE
CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
BERING FINAL
ORDER
NOS.21709-21710/2025 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NOS.20984/2015 AND 21004/2015 DATED 30.10.2025 PASSED BY THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU (ANNEXURE-A).
Digitally signed by G SHREERAKSHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS and HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS) Sri.Aravind V. Chavan, learned counsel takes notice for the respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal filed by the Company in Central Excise Appeal No.17/2026 has been disposed of on 02.07.2026 and the matter has been remanded back to the Tribunal to consider the question of limitation raised by the appellant. This appeal is filed by the Director of the Company and therefore, this appeal also can be disposed of in similar terms.
3. Since Sri.Aravind V. Chavan, learned counsel also represented the respondents in the said appeal, there is
HC-KAR
no objection to the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant.
4. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of while remanding the matter back to the Tribunal to consider the question of limitation raised by the appellant, as was directed in Central Excise Appeal No.17/2026 dated 02.07.2026.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
MH/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17