Karnataka High Court

WP/24947/2025 of SRI. M. G. MOHAN Vs SRI. M. G. KALE GOWDA on 25 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010536612025 NC: 2026:KHC:46049 WP No. 24947 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 24947 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. M. G. MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 24947 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SRI. M. G. MOHAN,

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

S/O LATE GIDDE GOWDA,

RESIDING AT SATHIHALLI,

GULLAMPETE POST,

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. MANJUNATH PRASAD H.N., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI. M. G. KALE GOWDA,

S/O LATE GIDDE GOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,

2.

SRI. M.G. KRISHNE GOWDA,

S/O LATE GIDDE GOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,

RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2

ARE RESIDING AT SATHIHALLI,

GULLANAPETE POST,

Digitally

signed by

SUVARNA T

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

3.

SRI. M.G. JAGADEESHA,

S/O LATE GIDDE GOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,

4.

SRI. M.G. MURALIDHARA,

S/O LATE GIDDE GOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND 4

ARE RESIDING AT MANIMAKKI,

KELAGUR POST, ADLUR HOBLI,

CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK

AND DISTRICT – 577 101.

5.

SMT. JYOTHI,

D/O LATE GIDDE GOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

RESIDING AT SATHIHALLI,

GULLANAPETE POST,

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI.B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER

DATED 24.04.2025 PASSED BY THE IST ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL

JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKAMAGALURU ON IA NO.21 IN OS NO.

89/2019 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY

ALLOW THE IA NO.21 AND ETC.,

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Submission is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

4. All Pending IAs in this petition shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead