Karnataka High Court
WP/17770/2025 of SRI KRISHNA B D Vs SRI RUDRESH B R on 25 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010395692025 NC: 2026:KHC:45829 WP No. 17770 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 17770 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI KRISHNA B D S/O. LATE DODDAHUCHCHAIAH,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 17770 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI KRISHNA B D
S/O. LATE DODDAHUCHCHAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/OF BEKKALALE VILLAGE,
KOPPA HOBLI MADDUR TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT-571 425.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SOMASHEKHARAIAH R.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI RUDRESH B R
S/O. LATE RUDREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
AGRICULTURIST,
R/OF BEKKALALE VILLAGE,
KOPPA HOBLI,
MADDUR TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT – 571425
2.
SRI D. VASUDEV,
S/O. LATE DODDAHUCHAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
R/OF BEKKALALE VILLAGE,
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
KOPPA HOBLI,
MADDUR TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 425
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. R. KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 (CP 10299/2025)
SRI. CHKKAHANUMAIAH T.C., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED
06/03/2025 MADE ON IA NO.6 AND 7, AND THE ORDER DTD.
16/4/2022 MADE ON I.A. NO.1 AND THE SUBSEQUENT ORDER
DTD. 17/4/2025, IN EX. P.NO.84/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE
ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, MADDUR, MANDYA, UNDER
ANNEXURE-N ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to challenge the compromise decree passed in O.S. No.76/2021 dated 14.08.2021.
2. The memo is taken on record.
HC-KAR
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the compromise decree, if permissible as per law.
5. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10