Karnataka High Court

CRL.P/11843/2026 of K GIRI PRASAD Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010540272026 NC: 2026:KHC:45698 CRL.P No. 11843 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11843 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. K GIRI PRASAD, WRONGLY MENTIONED AS GIRIPRASAD IN

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11843 OF 2026

BETWEEN:

1.

K GIRI PRASAD,

WRONGLY MENTIONED AS GIRIPRASAD

IN THE FIR,

S/O S. KRISHNAREDDY,

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

R/AT NO.21, 1ST MAIN,

MALLAPPA LAYOUT,

SEEGEHALLI, VIRGONAGAR,

BENGALURU – 560 049.

2.

K. CHETHANA SHREE,

WRONGLY MENTIONED AS

CHETHU IN THE FIR,

D/O KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,

R/AT NO.21, 1ST FLOOR,

NEAR BIBLE COLLEGE,

BHATTARAHALLI,

BANGALORE – 560 049.

3.

LEELAVATHI,

WRONGLY MENTIONED AS

NILAVATHI IN THE FIR,

W/O KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

Digitally

signed by

PADMAVATHI

B K

Location:

High Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

R/AT NO.21, 1ST MAIN,

MALLAPPA LAYOUT,

SEEGEHALLI, VIRGONAGAR,

BENGALURU – 560 049.

4.

S. KRISHNAREDDY,

WRONGLY MENTIONED AS

KRUSHNA REDDY IN THE FIR,

S/O A. SIDDAREDDY,

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

R/AT NO.21, 1ST MAIN,

MALLAPPA LAYOUT,

SEEGEHALLI, VIRGONAGAR,

BENGALURU – 560 049.

5.

KAMALAMMA,

C/O KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

R/AT NO.01, 1ST MAIN,

2ND CROSS, MALLAPPA LAYOUT,

SEEGEHALLI, VIRGONAGAR,

BENGALURU – 560 049.

6.

MANJUNATHA C,

WRONGLY MENTIONED AS

MANJU IN THE FIR,

S/O LATE CHANDRA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

R/AT NO.122, NGR LAYOUT,

NEAR GANESHA TEMPLE,

ROOPENA AGRAHARA,

BANGALORE – 560 068.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SMT. YUKTHA N., ADVOCATE)

HC-KAR

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA,

BY KR PURAM PS, BENGALURU,

REPRESENTED BY THE

STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

HIGH COURT BUILDING,

BENGALURU - 560 001.

2.

PRABHAVATHI,

W/O RADHA KRISHNA REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,

R/AT NO.25/1, 1ST MAIN,

MALLAPPA LAYOUT, SEEGEHALLI,

KR PURAM, VIRGONAGAR POST,

BENGALURU – 560 049.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT.DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R1;

SRI.NIKHIL SAI M., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528

BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN S.C.

NO.1020/2022 PENDING BEFORE THE LEARNED LXXI ADDL.

CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU FOR THE

OFFENCES U/S. 323, 324, 427, 307, 506, 326 R/W. 149 OF

THE IPC ARISING OUT OF FIR BEARING CRIME NO.172/2020

REGISTERED BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.1 POLICE.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court calling in question the proceedings in S.C.No.1020/2022 registered for offences punishable under Sections 324, 307 and 149 of IPC.

2. Heard Smt. Yuktha N., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Smt. Deepthi Alva, learned HCGP appearing for respondent No.1, Sri. Nikhil Sai learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and have perused the material on record.

3. During the pendency of these proceedings, it transpires that the parties to the lis have entered into a settlement and have placed on record the compromise petition. Terms of settlement reads as follows:

"MEMORANDUM OF COMPROMISE PETITION UNDER SECTION 528 OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 The Petitioners and the Respondent No.2 submit as follows:

HC-KAR

1. It is submitted that the present petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking quashing of the entire proceedings in S.C. No. 1020/2022 pending before the Learned LXXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru for the offences u/s. 323, 324, 504, 506, 354(A), 307, 326 r/w. 34 of the IPC arising out of FIR bearing Crime No. 172/2020 registered before the Respondent No.1 police against the Petitioners herein.

2. The Petitioners and Respondent No.2, being relatives, had certain misunderstandings which led to the lodging of the Complaint and the subsequent registration of FIR in Crime No. 172/2020 by the Respondent No.1 Police Station. Thereafter, with the intervention and considered advice of elders and well-wishers of both families, the parties have amicably resolved all their differences and have mutually agreed to settle the matter in its entirety.

3. Accordingly, the Respondent No.2 submits that she has no objection to the quashing of the entire proceedings in S.C. No. 1020/2022 pending before the Learned LXXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru for the offences u/s. 323, 324, 427, 506, 307, 326 r/w. 149 of the IPC arising out of FIR bearing Crime No. 172/2020 registered before the Respondent No.1 police as against the Petitioners herein.

4. It is submitted that in terms of the settlement arrived between the parties, the Respondent No.2 has no

HC-KAR

objection to allow the present petition and quash the entire proceedings in S.C. No. 1020/2022 pending before the Learned LXXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru for the offences u/s. 323, 324, 427, 506, 307, 326 r/w. 149 of the IPC arising out of FIR bearing Crime No. 172/2020 registered before the Respondent No.1 police as against the Petitioners herein.

5. It is further submitted that, the Petitioner No.2 herein, has initiated proceedings in S.C. No. 1020/2022 pending before the Learned LXXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru against the Respondent No. 2 herein and others for the offences u/s. 323, 324, 427, 307. 506, 326 r/w. 149 of IPC arising out of FIR bearing Crime No.

registered before the Respondent Subsequently, the Respondent No. 2 herein along with others have filed Crl. P. No. 11882/2026 pending before this Hon'ble Court for quashing of the same. As per the terms of the settlement arrived between the parties, the Petitioner No.2 herein has unequivocally agreed to tender no objection to allow Crl. P. No. 11882/2026 pending before this Hon'ble Court and quash the entire proceedings S.C. No. 15/2022 pending before the Learned LXXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru for the offences u/s. 323, 324, 427, 307, 504, 506, 354(A) 326 r/w. 34 of the IPC arising out of FIR bearing Crime No. 171/2020 registered before the Respondent No. 1 police.

6. The Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 agree not to initiate any further legal proceedings, whether civil or

HC-KAR

criminal, against each other before any Court or Authority for the same cause of action.

7. Both the Parties herein further state that there has been no collusion or force, fraud or any undue influence in entering into the settlement or agreement in the aforesaid manner. The parties agree that the present compromise petition is a reflection of their understanding and the terms of the same are finalized after due deliberations, amicably and upon mutual consent. Hence, the terms of the present petition are binding on the parties and shall not be challenged by them.

Wherefore, it is prayed that, this Hon'ble court may be pleased to allow the present petition as prayed for and quash the entire proceedings in S.C. No. 1020/2022 pending before the Learned LXXI AddI. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru for the offences u/s. 323, 324, 427, 307, 504, 506, 326 r/w. 149 of the IPC arising out of FIR bearing Crime No. 172/2020 registered before the Respondent No.1 police as against the Petitioners herein, in the interest of justice and equity."

4. In the light of Compromise Petition being filed and offences not being against the State, I deem it appropriate to accept the Compromise petition and terminate the proceedings against the petitioners in the subject petition.

HC-KAR

5. For the aforesaid reasons, the following:

ORDER

i. Criminal Petition stands disposed. ii. Proceedings pending in S.C.No.1020/2022 before the LXXI Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, against the petitioners stands quashed.

Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

HR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 40

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead