Karnataka High Court
WP/24447/2026 of SMT. CHANDRAKALA Vs SRI. K.T. LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH on 24 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010539672026 NC: 2026:KHC:45534 WP No. 24447 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 24447 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. CHANDRAKALA D/O THOTADANARASEGOWDA W/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 24447 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. CHANDRAKALA
D/O THOTADANARASEGOWDA
W/O SHIVAKUMAR K.B.,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
R/AT NO.80/4, 3RD CROSS,
BEL LAYOUT, OPP SBI BANK ROAD,
NEAR DS-MAX APARTMENT,
MAGADI MAIN ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 091.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. UMA SHANKAR L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. K.T. LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH
S/O. LATE THOTADAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS.
2.
SMT.LAKHMIDEVI,
W/O. K.T.LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 ARE
R/ AT THODADAPPA NILAYA
1ST MAIN ROAD,
VINAYAKA NAGARA,
KADABAGERE POST,
DASANAPURA HOBLI
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK,
BANGALORE – 562 130
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
SMT.JAYAMMA
W/O LATE NARASEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
4.
SRI. NARAYANA
S/O LATE NARASEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
RESPONDENT NO.3 & 4 ARE
R/ AT KALLURU VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
MAGADI TALUK,
MAGADI, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562 120
5.
SRI. MUKUNDAIAH,
S/O. LATE RAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
AKILA KARNATAKA SUGUNA
JYOTHISHYALAYA,
OPP. MARUTHI MEDICAL ROAD,
MUDDANAPALYA MAIN ROAD,
ANJANA NAGAR,
VISHWANEEDAM POST,
BANGALORE-560091
6.
SRI. MAHALAKSHMI,
W/O. LATE BHASKARA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
7.
SRI. PRASHANTHA,
S/O LATE BHASKARA
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS
RESPONDENT NO. 6 AND 7 ARE
R/ AT NO,612, BHASKARA KRUPA,
PIPE LINE ROAD,
MAHADESHWARA NAGAR,
BANGALORE – 560 091
8.
CHANDRAPPA
HC-KAR
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/O BEHIND DEVI BEKARY,
MUDDANAPLAYA ROAD,
ANJANA NAGAR,
VISHWANEEDAM POST,
BANGALORE-560 091
9.
MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE RAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R/O NO 218, 17TH CROSS,
10TH MAIN, PAADARAYANAPURA,
BANALORE-560 026
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS, OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR
DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE COURT OF ADDL SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC AT MAGADI TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF
L.A. NO. 17, FILED UNDER ORDER 22 RULE 10 CPC DATED
28.06.2024, IN O.S. NO.858/2014, EXPEDITIOUSLY AND IN
ANY EVENT WITHIN A PERIOD OF (E.G., FOUR/SIX/EIGHT
WEEKS) AND ALSO DIRECTING DISPOSE THE ABOVE SUIT
EXPEDITIOUSLY WITH IN THE PERIOD OF ONE/TWO YEAR
FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE
ORDER PASSED HEREIN.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: “In view of the facts and circumstances stated above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
i. Issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Court of Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Magadi to consider and dispose of I.A.No.17, filed under Order 22 Rule
CPC dated 28.06.2024 in O.S.No.858/2014, expeditiously and in any event within a period of [four/six/eight weeks] and also directing dispose of the above suit expeditiously within a period of one/two year from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order passed herein;
ii. Pass any other order or directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.”
2. Considering the fact that the suit is of the year 2014, this Court has called for a report from the concerned Court on how much time it requires to dispose of the matter. The learned Judge has sought one year time to dispose of the
HC-KAR
matter. Considering the same, this Court is passing the following:
ORDER
i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing Addl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Magadi to dispose of the suit within a period of 1 year from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.
ii. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57