Karnataka High Court
RFA/424/2021 of MRS SHAHNAZ ALI Vs MR RAHMATH ALI JUNG on 24 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010123112021 NC: 2026:KHC:45569 RFA No. 424 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 424 OF 2021 (SP) BETWEEN: MRS. SHAHNAZ ALI, W/O MR SYED ZAHID ALI, AGED ABOUT 50
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 424 OF 2021 (SP)
BETWEEN:
MRS. SHAHNAZ ALI,
W/O MR SYED ZAHID ALI,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/A NO.28/1,ROBERTSON ROAD,
REP BY GPA HOLDER
MR SYED ZAHID ALI,
S/O SYED MOHAMMED,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/A NO.28/1,ROBERTSON ROAD,
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SRI.RAGHUNATH M.D., AND
SRI. P.S. SAMEER AHAMED, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MR. RAHMATH ALI JUNG,
S/O LATE MUNTAZ ALI,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
2.
MRS. ZAKIA BEGUM,
W/O RAHMATH ALI JUNG,
MAJOR,
3.
MR R JABI ALI
S/O RAHMATH ALI JUNG
MAJOR,
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
4.
MR. R. ZUBAIR ALI,
S/O RAHMATH ALI JUNG,
MAJOR,
SL. NO.1 TO 4 RESIDING AT
PORTION OF NO.28,
ROBERTSON ROAD,
…RESPONDENTS
(BY VISHWAS GOUDA G.M., ADVOCATE FR R1 TO R4)
THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:11.12.2020 PASSED IN
OS No.15237/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDL.CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH-
22) DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF
CONTRACT AND DECLARATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
This Court on 13.08.2026, passed the following order: "ORAL ORDER
Sri.Rakshith, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.Raghunath.M.D, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks a short accommodation stating personal inconvenience and he further submits that, he would prepare himself and argue the matter. On the assurance, post this appeal on 24.08.2026."
2. The appeal is listed today.
3. This appeal is filed in the year 2021. A perusal of the daily order sheet clearly shows that, on one or the other reason, the appeal is not heard and on the last date of hearing, assurance was made to the Court that, the matter would be argued without fail on the next date of hearing on 24.08.2026. However, none appeared on behalf of the appellant when the matter is called at 4:23 pm, for final hearing. The conduct of the appellant shows
HC-KAR
that she has no interest to prosecute the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
4. In view of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted, if any, shall stand discharged.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14