CRL.A/1949/2025 of STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs MANJUNATH on 24 August 2026

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)

This matter is listed for admission and we have heard Sri.Mohammed Ayub Ali, learned Additional SPP appearing for the State and Sri Hitesh Gowda, B.J., learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. The factual matrix of case of prosecution before the Trial Court is that, accused is a step father of CW2-victim girl and since from 3 years he continuously committing rape on victim girl in her house bearing No.2/3, situated at 17th Cross, 10th Main, Padarayanapura. In this regard, CW2 informed CW3 about the said sexual assault committed by the accused against her and thereafter, CW3 informed about the same to CW4. The CW4 along with CW1 enquired CW2 about the incident and CW1 gave the complaint against the accused and thereby accused committed the alleged offences. Based on the complaint, the Police have registered

HC-KAR

the case and after investigation, filed the charge sheet against the accused. The accused did not plead guilty and claimed to be tried.

3. Hence, prosecution in order to prove its case, examined 13 witnesses as PW.1 to PW.13 and got marked 19 documents as Exhibit P1 to Exhibit P19. The accused has not led any evidence on his behalf.

4. The Trial Court, having taken note of the nature of the evidence adduced by the victim as well as the mother that she has falsely deposed before the Court and the Trial Court extracted the evidence given by the victim in paragraph Nos.29, 30 and 31 and also taken note of the evidence of Doctor in paragraph No.39 who has been examined as PW9 and Exhibit P12-the Provisional Report of the victim marked through PW9, wherein the Doctor has mentioned that victim's hymen was intact. There was no recent sexual assault. However, taken note of the evidence of PW9, even though there was sexual intercourse, there are

HC-KAR

chances of hymen intact because some girls will have the elasticity of their hymen.

5. Learned Additional SPP for the State brought to the notice of this Court the evidence of PW9 and contend that when the child is below 12 years, then she has to take consent from her parents. But on that day the victim's parents did not come to the hospital when she was subjected to medical examination and the same is observed in paragraph No.39. Having considered the evidence of victim girl, mother of the victim girl and so also the evidence of the Doctor, who have not supported the case of the prosecution, do not inspire the confidence of the Court with regard to subjecting the girl for sexual act and also taken note of the age of accused as 43 years and the relationship of accused and the victim girl and further having taken note of overall evidence available on record, comes to the conclusion that prosecution has failed to prove the guilt of the accused and accordingly acquitted the accused. Being aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is preferred by the State.

HC-KAR

6. The main contention of the learned Additional SPP for the State is that even though medical evidence not supports the case of prosecution, the Trial Court could have considered the evidence of PW9 since there is a chances of elasticity of some girls were subjected to sexual act if hymen is intact. But it is the case of prosecution that she was subjected to sexual act for a period of 3 years that too in the very same house wherein the accused was also residing. When such being the case, the very submission of learned Additional SPP that the matter requires reconsideration cannot be accepted and if she was subjected to sexual act for a period of 3 years question of hymen intact cannot be believed.

7. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/accused also brought to the notice of this Court that this accused is a step father and the very allegation is nothing but a false allegation and the statements are made at the instance of the mother earlier and both of them have also not supported the case of prosecution before the Court.

HC-KAR

Though statements are made before the police and when the same is not corroborated, question of entertaining this appeal doesn't arise. Having assessed overall evidence available on record particularly when the victim and her mother who have been examined before the Court as PW1 and PW.2 and both of them have not supported and Doctor PW9 who examined the victim girl has categorically deposed that the hymen was intact and when the specific allegation was made that she was subjected to sexual act for a period of 3 years in the very same residence and the same does not disclose anything about. The medical report is also very clear that she was not subjected to any recent sexual act.

8. The prosecution has also relied on the Exhibit P11 certified copy of age certificate issued by the victim's school and the same is also not proved in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in P. YUVAPRAKASH V/s State, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, reported in 2023 INSC

676. HC-KAR

9. Having taken note of material available on record and also in view of the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in P. Yuvaprakash (supra), the question of entertaining this appeal does not arise. Hence, no grounds are made out to admit the appeal considering the material on record and for reconsideration.

10. In view of the discussions made above, we pass the following:

ORDER

The appeal is dismissed.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

Sd/- (B.PRAMOD) JUDGE

MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6