Karnataka High Court
WP/24605/2024 of MOHINI VENUGOPAL Vs MITHUN K MANOHARAM on 24 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010509532024 NC: 2026:KHC:45644 WP No. 24605 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 24605 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MOHINI VENUGOPAL D/O VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 28
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010509532024
NC: 2026:KHC:45644
WP No. 24605 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 24605 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
MOHINI VENUGOPAL
D/O VENUGOPAL
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 481D, JAL VAYU VIHAR,
HRBR LAYOUT, 2ND BLOCK,
KALYANA NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560043.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KAPIL DIXIT., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MITHUN K MANOHARAM
S/O LATE K MANOHARAN
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
R/AT NO. D 408
INDUS SIGNATURE APARTMENT
ISHWAR LAYOUT, INDIRANAGAR
BANGALORE-560008.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF
CR.PC PRAYING TO ISSUE DIRECTION TO THE HONBLE I
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRAFFIC COURT BANGALORE TO
EXPEDITE THE DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS IN CRL MISC NO.
115/2022ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL
JUDGE, FAMILY COURT BANGALORE TO WRAP UP THE
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010509532024
NC: 2026:KHC:45644
WP No. 24605 of 2024
LITIGATIONS IN CRL MSIC NO. 115/2020 WITHIN AN OUTER
LIMIT OF THREE MONTH.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The case is called twice today. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. This Court on 27.07.2026, passed a peremptory order, which reads as follows: “A week's time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the Registry is directed to list the matter for dismissal of the petition for non-compliance of office objections. Even today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
HR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 111