Karnataka High Court

MFA/486/2023 of SRI CHANNAKRISHNA Vs SRI MADHU M on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010034792023 NC: 2026:KHC:45554 MFA No. 486 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 486 OF 2023 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SRI. CHANNAKRISHNA S/O CHOWDAPPA NOW AGED ABOUT

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 486 OF 2023 (MV-I)

BETWEEN:

SRI. CHANNAKRISHNA

S/O CHOWDAPPA

NOW AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

R/AT NO. 290,

4TH CROSS, HOSUR MAIN ROAD,

ASHRAYA MANEGALU, ANEKAL,

BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. GOPAL KRISHNA.N, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI. MADHU. M

S/O MUNIRAJAPPA

MAJOR,

R/AT SANTHEKALLAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST

CHINTAMANI TALUK,

CHIKKABALLAPURA – 563 128

2.

THE LIBERTY GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., OFFICE NO.1, ALYSSA

FIRST FLOOR, REAR PORTION

NEW NO. 23, RICHMOND ROAD

BANGALORE – 560 025

REP BY ITS MANAGER

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. RAVI.S.SAMPRATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2; V/O DATED 03.06.2024, NOTICE TO R1- D/W)

Digitally

signed by

REKHA R

Location:

High Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 02.11.2022 PASSED IN MVC

NO.2965/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SMALL

CAUSES JUDGE AND MACT, BENGALURU SCCH-11, PARTLY

ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND

SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION IN TIME.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation arising out of Judgment and Award dated 02.11.2022 in MVC.No.2965/2021 passed by the I Additional Small Causes Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru (SCCH-11)1.

2. The parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Tribunal.

1 'Tribunal' for short

HC-KAR

3. Heard Sri.Gopalakrishna.N, learned counsel appearing for Smt.Sushmitha.G, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri. Ravi S.Samprathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2/Insurer. Vide order dated 03.06.2024, notice to respondent No.1 is dispensed with.

4. Sri.Gopalkrishna, with all vehemence taking this Court to internal Page No.14 of the Judgment, contended that the doctor who has been examined has clearly stated the present status of the claimant, with the disability assessed by him at 65% to the right lower limb and 25% to both wrist and has stated that 28% to the whole body. However, the Tribunal has considered it at 21%. He further submits that, the compensation awarded on the other heads except the medical expenses and conveyance requires re-consideration and sought to enhance the compensation.

5. Sri. Ravi S.Samprathi, argued in support of the judgment and submits that, the Tribunal after considering

HC-KAR

the entire case properly appreciated the evidence and awarded appropriate compensation. However, with all fairness Sri.Ravi S.Samprathi, submits that the disability ought to have been considered at 28% as stated by the doctor.

6. Having considered the rival submissions this Court has perused the entire appeal papers as well as trial Court record.

7. It is not in dispute with regard to the fracture suffered i.e., head injury with facial bones fracture, fracture of right neck of femur, bilateral distal radius fracture, right distal femur comminuted fracture and the claimant has underwent ORIF for the distal femur with LCP, bipolar hemi-replacement, arthoplasty for right neck of femur fracture, closed reduction and K-Wire fixation for left and right distal end of the radius. The doctor has assessed the lower limb disability at 65% and both the wrist at 25% and to the whole body at 28%. The entire

HC-KAR

disability when added comes to 90%. 1/3rd of the same comes to 30%. Though the doctor has stated 28%, this Court proceeds to consider it at 30%. In view of considering the disability more than 20%, the claimant is also entitled for adding of future prospectus in view of settled principles of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

8. Considering the age of petitioner, 53 years as on the date of accident, he is entitled for adding 10% towards future prospectus. A perusal of the compensation awarded under other heads, except medical expenses requires reconsideration.

9. In view of multiple fractures suffered, surgeries undergone and medical expenses incurred, the claimant is entitled for enhancement of compensation, which is as under:

HC-KAR

Sl. No. Heads Compensation awarded by the Tribunal In Rs. By this Court In Rs.

1. Towards injury pain and suffering 55,000-00 1,00,000-00

2. Towards medical expenses 51,872-00 51,872-00

3. Towards food and extra nourishment and medical attendant 6,400-00 20,000-00

4. Towards conveyance 10,000-00 20,000-00

5. Towards loss of income during treatment 30,000-00 90,000-00 (Rs.15,000x6)

6. Towards loss of future earning 4,15,800-00 6,53,400-00 (Rs.15,000+10%x12x11 x30%)

7. Deprivation of future amenities 10,000-00 1,00,000-00

8. Toward future Medical Expenses 20,000-00 50,000-00

TOTAL 5,99,072-00 10,85,272-00

10. Accordingly, the claimant is entitled for enhanced compensation of Rs.4,86,200/- rounded off to Rs.4,87,000/- which shall carry at 6% p.a., from the date of petition till realisation.

11. For the foregoing reasons, this Court proceeds to pass the following:

HC-KAR

ORDER

i. Appeal is allowed-in-part.

ii. The judgment and award dated 02.11.2022 in MVC.No.2965/2021 passed by the I Additional Small Causes Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru (SCCH-11) is hereby modified and enhanced to Rs.4,87,000/- which shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till realisation.

iii. Respondent No.2/Insurer shall deposit entire enhanced compensation along with accrued interest stated supra within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

iv. Upon deposit, entire amount shall be released in favour of the claimant on proper identification.

HC-KAR

v. Registry is directed to transmit the Trial Court records forthwith to the concerned Tribunal without causing any delay.

PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead